Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMDSX vs RPMGX
BMDSX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BMDSX vs RPMGX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Investor
Price$20.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.56
Change+$0.21 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.79B
BMDSX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMDSX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDSX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.8B vs. BMDSX (1.43B). BMDSX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BMDSX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BMDSX (25 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). BMDSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). BMDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). BMDSX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. BMDSX (-5.97). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 4.60 vs. BMDSX (-10.65).
| BMDSX | RPMGX | BMDSX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.918 | 1.624 | -180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 27.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.97 | -4.25 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.40 | 13.89 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.65 | 4.60 | -232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.07 | 23.37 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement