BMOOF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.09M
GRLVF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
10.56M
Ad is loading...

BMOOF vs GRLVF

Header iconBMOOF vs GRLVF Comparison
Open Charts BMOOF vs GRLVFBanner chart's image
BLUE MOON METALS
Price$0.25
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization1.09M
Group Eleven Resources
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.04K
Capitalization10.56M
BMOOF vs GRLVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMOOF vs. GRLVF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMOOF is a Hold and GRLVF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BMOOF: $0.25 vs. GRLVF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: BMOOF and GRLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMOOF: 100% vs. GRLVF: 23%
Market capitalization -- BMOOF: $1.09M vs. GRLVF: $10.56M
BMOOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.09M. GRLVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMOOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRLVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRLVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the long-term than BMOOF.

Price Growth

BMOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.73% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLVF($10.6M) has a higher market cap than BMOOF($1.09M). GRLVF YTD gains are higher at: 8.340 vs. BMOOF (0.000). BMOOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -878.03K vs. GRLVF (-2.7M). GRLVF has more cash in the bank: 605K vs. BMOOF (137K). BMOOF (0) and GRLVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMOOFGRLVFBMOOF / GRLVF
Capitalization1.09M10.6M10%
EBITDA-878.03K-2.7M32%
Gain YTD0.0008.340-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash137K605K23%
Total DebtN/A40K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMOOF vs GRLVF: Fundamental Ratings
BMOOF
GRLVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8831
SMR RATING
1..100
9193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRLVF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMOOF (94). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMOOF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMOOF (88). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMOOF’s over the last 12 months.

BMOOF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (93). This means that BMOOF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMOOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (50). This means that BMOOF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMOOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (100). This means that BMOOF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLF63.970.46
+0.72%
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Eq Fac ETF
CUBA2.620.01
+0.19%
Herzfeld Caribbean Basin Fund
EKG16.65N/A
N/A
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Dgtl Hlth SoluETF
NUBD22.05-0.02
-0.09%
Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF
XSVN47.22-0.07
-0.14%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF

BMOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMOOF and MCHHF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMOOF and MCHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMOOF
1D Price
Change %
BMOOF100%
N/A
MCHHF - BMOOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - BMOOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
BNNLF - BMOOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.68%
GRDAF - BMOOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+10.95%
EROSF - BMOOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLVF and TORVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLVF and TORVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLVF
1D Price
Change %
GRLVF100%
-4.05%
TORVF - GRLVF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCNNF - GRLVF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
BMOOF - GRLVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - GRLVF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
HANNF - GRLVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-9.27%
More