BMOOF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
GRLVF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMOOF vs GRLVF

Header iconBMOOF vs GRLVF Comparison
Open Charts BMOOF vs GRLVFBanner chart's image
BLUE MOON METALS
Price$0.25
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Group Eleven Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$183.04K
CapitalizationN/A
BMOOF vs GRLVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMOOF vs. GRLVF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMOOF is a Sell and GRLVF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BMOOF: $0.25 vs. GRLVF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: BMOOF and GRLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMOOF: 18% vs. GRLVF: 195%
Market capitalization -- BMOOF: $1.09M vs. GRLVF: $10.56M
BMOOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.09M. GRLVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMOOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRLVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRLVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the long-term than BMOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMOOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRLVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMOOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRLVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMOOF is a better buy in the short-term than GRLVF.

Price Growth

BMOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLVF($10.6M) has a higher market cap than BMOOF($1.09M). BMOOF YTD gains are higher at: 433.646 vs. GRLVF (-7.623). BMOOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -878.03K vs. GRLVF (-2.7M). GRLVF has more cash in the bank: 605K vs. BMOOF (137K). BMOOF (0) and GRLVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMOOFGRLVFBMOOF / GRLVF
Capitalization1.09M10.6M10%
EBITDA-878.03K-2.7M32%
Gain YTD433.646-7.623-5,689%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash137K605K23%
Total DebtN/A40K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMOOF vs GRLVF: Fundamental Ratings
BMOOF
GRLVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8636
SMR RATING
1..100
9596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRLVF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMOOF (90). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMOOF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMOOF (86). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMOOF’s over the last 12 months.

BMOOF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (96). This means that BMOOF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMOOF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (62). This means that BMOOF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

BMOOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (100). This means that BMOOF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMOOFGRLVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JERIX11.70-0.03
-0.26%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate I
CEUFX57.02-0.21
-0.37%
American Funds Europacific Growth 529F1
SMISX31.56-0.31
-0.97%
Invesco Summit R6
OANGX33.10-0.34
-1.02%
Oakmark Global Institutional
ACWEX14.30-0.18
-1.24%
Cavanal Hill World Energy C

BMOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMOOF and MCHHF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMOOF and MCHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMOOF
1D Price
Change %
BMOOF100%
N/A
MCHHF - BMOOF
28%
Poorly correlated
-11.77%
GRLVF - BMOOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
BNNLF - BMOOF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
GRDAF - BMOOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.58%
EROSF - BMOOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLVF and TORVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLVF and TORVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLVF
1D Price
Change %
GRLVF100%
-1.60%
TORVF - GRLVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
DCNNF - GRLVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMOOF - GRLVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - GRLVF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
HANNF - GRLVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
More