Ad is loading...
BMQSX vs FSMUX
BMQSX vs FSMUX Comparison
Open Charts BMQSX vs FSMUX
Baird Municipal Bond Investor
Price$9.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets398.26M
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.66B
BMQSX vs FSMUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. BMQSX (398M). FSMUX pays higher dividends than BMQSX: FSMUX (3.76) vs BMQSX (3.53). BMQSX was incepted earlier than FSMUX: BMQSX (5 years) vs FSMUX (4 years). BMQSX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). BMQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMUX (48.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMQSX: FSMUX (0) vs BMQSX (2500). BMQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. FSMUX (1.37).
| BMQSX | FSMUX | BMQSX / FSMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.19 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.44 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.144 | -2.239 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 11.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 3.76 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | 1.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.35 | 5.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...