Ad is loading...
BMQSX vs FSMUX
BMQSX vs FSMUX Comparison
Open Charts BMQSX vs FSMUX
Baird Municipal Bond Investor
Price$9.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.04M
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
BMQSX vs FSMUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. BMQSX (437M). FSMUX pays higher dividends than BMQSX: FSMUX (3.83) vs BMQSX (3.53). BMQSX was incepted earlier than FSMUX: BMQSX (6 years) vs FSMUX (4 years). BMQSX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX (48.00) and BMQSX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMQSX: FSMUX (0) vs BMQSX (2500). BMQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.85 vs. FSMUX (1.07).
| BMQSX | FSMUX | BMQSX / FSMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.19 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.44 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.484 | -1.453 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 11.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 3.83 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.85 | 1.07 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.24 | 9.55 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.11 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |