BMRC
Price
$23.43
Change
+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
265.89M
8 days until earnings call
CLST
Price
$11.75
Change
+$0.16 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.99M
Ad is loading...

BMRC vs CLST

Header iconBMRC vs CLST Comparison
Open Charts BMRC vs CLSTBanner chart's image
Bank of Marin Ban
Price$23.43
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Volume$42.01K
Capitalization265.89M
Catalyst Ban
Price$11.75
Change+$0.16 (+1.38%)
Volume$11.26K
Capitalization53.99M
BMRC vs CLST Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMRC vs. CLST commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMRC is a Hold and CLST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BMRC: $23.43 vs. CLST: $11.75)
Brand notoriety: BMRC and CLST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMRC: 81% vs. CLST: 97%
Market capitalization -- BMRC: $265.89M vs. CLST: $53.99M
BMRC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $265.89M. CLST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $53.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMRC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMRC is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMRC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLST’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMRC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLST’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMRC is a better buy in the short-term than CLST.

Price Growth

BMRC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.02% price change this week, while CLST (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMRC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

CLST is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMRC($266M) has a higher market cap than CLST($54M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than BMRC: CLST (84.57) vs BMRC (13.24). CLST YTD gains are higher at: -0.170 vs. BMRC (-1.430). BMRC has higher revenues than CLST: BMRC (105M) vs CLST (9.14M).
BMRCCLSTBMRC / CLST
Capitalization266M54M493%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.430-0.170842%
P/E Ratio13.2484.5716%
Revenue105M9.14M1,149%
Total Cash28.3MN/A-
Total Debt49.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMRC vs CLST: Fundamental Ratings
BMRC
CLST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
714
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
5490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
481
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMRC's Valuation (83) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (95) in the null industry. This means that BMRC’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMRC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew significantly faster than BMRC’s over the last 12 months.

BMRC's SMR Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (90) in the null industry. This means that BMRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

BMRC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (52) in the null industry. This means that BMRC’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

BMRC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (81) in the null industry. This means that BMRC’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMRCCLST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPTIX103.271.44
+1.41%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R6
MRGSX21.400.16
+0.75%
BlackRock Advantage Global R
GUSYX21.140.12
+0.57%
Grandeur Peak US Stalwarts Institutional
JSCVX23.520.13
+0.56%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value T
NSFEX10.660.03
+0.28%
Natixis Target Retirement 2025 N

BMRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMRC has been closely correlated with HFWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMRC jumps, then HFWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMRC
1D Price
Change %
BMRC100%
+0.47%
HFWA - BMRC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HOPE - BMRC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
FCF - BMRC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
TRST - BMRC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CTBI - BMRC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
More

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLST and WSBC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLST and WSBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
+0.53%
WSBC - CLST
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
CHMG - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
BMRC - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
PPBI - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
EFSC - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More