Ad is loading...
BNCZF
Price
$6.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
MBBC
Price
$9.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

BNCZF vs MBBC

Header iconBNCZF vs MBBC Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs MBBCBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$6.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.52K
CapitalizationN/A
Marathon Ban
Price$9.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
BNCZF vs MBBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. MBBC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Hold and MBBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $6.61 vs. MBBC: $9.75)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and MBBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 100% vs. MBBC: 75%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $7.61B vs. MBBC: $19.62M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.61B. MBBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $19.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than MBBC.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBBC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($7.61B) has a higher market cap than MBBC($19.6M). MBBC has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: MBBC (12.48) vs BNCZF (6.48). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 15.965 vs. MBBC (4.390). MBBC has less debt than BNCZF: MBBC (5M) vs BNCZF (20.7B). BNCZF has higher revenues than MBBC: BNCZF (5.15B) vs MBBC (7.68M).
BNCZFMBBCBNCZF / MBBC
Capitalization7.61B19.6M38,816%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.9654.390364%
P/E Ratio6.4812.4852%
Revenue5.15B7.68M67,092%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20.7B5M414,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDV28.170.23
+0.82%
iShares International Select Div ETF
NSCS30.22N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF
MTGP43.65-0.02
-0.04%
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond
FDRR52.27-0.52
-0.99%
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
EIS69.63-1.07
-1.51%
iShares MSCI Israel ETF

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More

MBBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBBC and HMST have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBBC and HMST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBBC
1D Price
Change %
MBBC100%
N/A
HMST - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
PPLL - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBZ - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
JTNB - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCZF - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More