BNCZF
Price
$12.00
Change
+$3.00 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.61B
MBBC
Price
$10.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs MBBC

Header iconBNCZF vs MBBC Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs MBBCBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$12.00
Change+$3.00 (+33.33%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.61B
Marathon Ban
Price$10.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.87K
Capitalization19.62M
BNCZF vs MBBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. MBBC commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Buy and MBBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $12.00 vs. MBBC: $10.03)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and MBBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 100% vs. MBBC: 196%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $7.61B vs. MBBC: $19.62M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.61B. MBBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $19.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than MBBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MBBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBBC is a better buy in the short-term than BNCZF.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +33.33% price change this week, while MBBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBBC is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($7.61B) has a higher market cap than MBBC($19.6M). MBBC has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: MBBC (12.48) vs BNCZF (6.48). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 47.059 vs. MBBC (-47.813). MBBC has less debt than BNCZF: MBBC (5M) vs BNCZF (20.7B). BNCZF has higher revenues than MBBC: BNCZF (5.15B) vs MBBC (7.68M).
BNCZFMBBCBNCZF / MBBC
Capitalization7.61B19.6M38,816%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.059-47.813-98%
P/E Ratio6.4812.4852%
Revenue5.15B7.68M67,092%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20.7B5M414,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFMBBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
20%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHN9.69-0.01
-0.09%
Blackrock Muniholdings NEW York Quality Fund
BXMX13.96-0.04
-0.29%
NUVEEN S&P BUY-WRITE Income FUND
ASMF22.50-0.10
-0.45%
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
SPD37.54-0.33
-0.88%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF
HDLB15.25-0.35
-2.22%
ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
+33.33%
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
More

MBBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBBC and HMST have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBBC and HMST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBBC
1D Price
Change %
MBBC100%
N/A
HMST - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
PPLL - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBZ - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
JTNB - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
BNCZF - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+33.33%
More