BNL
Price
$18.63
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:19 AM (EDT)
12 days until earnings call
FBASF
Price
$1.17
Change
-$0.03 (-2.50%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BNL vs FBASF

Header iconBNL vs FBASF Comparison
Open Charts BNL vs FBASFBanner chart's image
Broadstone Net Lease
Price$18.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.17
Change-$0.03 (-2.50%)
Volume$1.17K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BNL vs FBASF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BNL vs. FBASF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNL is a Sell and FBASF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BNL: $18.61 vs. FBASF: $1.17)
Brand notoriety: BNL and FBASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNL: 93% vs. FBASF: 5%
Market capitalization -- BNL: $2.95B vs. FBASF: $5.74B
BNL [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.95B. FBASF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $5.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBASF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNL is a better buy in the long-term than FBASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BNL (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while FBASF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -5.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNL is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.34% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBASF($5.74B) has a higher market cap than BNL($2.95B). BNL has higher P/E ratio than FBASF: BNL (18.64) vs FBASF (3.47). BNL YTD gains are higher at: 11.817 vs. FBASF (-36.757). FBASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. BNL (403M). FBASF has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. BNL (19.5M). BNL has less debt than FBASF: BNL (1.91B) vs FBASF (128B). FBASF has higher revenues than BNL: FBASF (24.6B) vs BNL (443M).
BNLFBASFBNL / FBASF
Capitalization2.95B5.74B51%
EBITDA403M39.1B1%
Gain YTD11.817-36.757-32%
P/E Ratio18.643.47538%
Revenue443M24.6B2%
Total Cash19.5M3.51B1%
Total Debt1.91B128B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBASF: Fundamental Ratings
FBASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNL has been closely correlated with GNL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNL jumps, then GNL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNL
1D Price
Change %
BNL100%
-0.37%
GNL - BNL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
LXP - BNL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
ARE - BNL
70%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
BXP - BNL
69%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
DEA - BNL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
More

FBASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBASF and ABR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBASF and ABR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBASF
1D Price
Change %
FBASF100%
-2.50%
ABR - FBASF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
FCXXF - FBASF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBL - FBASF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
HHDS - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNL - FBASF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More