BNNLF
Price
$1.58
Change
+$0.33 (+26.40%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
182.39M
CCJ
Price
$40.84
Change
+$2.16 (+5.58%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BNNLF vs CCJ

Header iconBNNLF vs CCJ Comparison
Open Charts BNNLF vs CCJBanner chart's image
BANNERMAN ENERGY
Price$1.58
Change+$0.33 (+26.40%)
Volume$91.46K
Capitalization182.39M
Came
Price$40.84
Change+$2.16 (+5.58%)
Volume$4.79M
Capitalization20.38B
BNNLF vs CCJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNNLF vs. CCJ commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNNLF is a Hold and CCJ is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BNNLF: $1.58 vs. CCJ: $40.84)
Brand notoriety: BNNLF: Not notable vs. CCJ: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNNLF: 181% vs. CCJ: 111%
Market capitalization -- BNNLF: $182.39M vs. CCJ: $20.38B
BNNLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $182.39M. CCJ’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNNLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCCJ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNNLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CCJ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNNLF and CCJ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNNLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCJ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNNLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CCJ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNNLF is a better buy in the short-term than CCJ.

Price Growth

BNNLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +25.40% price change this week, while CCJ (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCJ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.16% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCJ($20.4B) has a higher market cap than BNNLF($182M). BNNLF YTD gains are higher at: -13.661 vs. CCJ (-20.529). CCJ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 800M vs. BNNLF (-2.56M). CCJ has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. BNNLF (4.17M). BNNLF has less debt than CCJ: BNNLF (46K) vs CCJ (1.78B).
BNNLFCCJBNNLF / CCJ
Capitalization182M20.4B1%
EBITDA-2.56M800M-0%
Gain YTD-13.661-20.52967%
P/E RatioN/A76.11-
RevenueN/A2.59B-
Total Cash4.17M567M1%
Total Debt46K1.78B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNNLF vs CCJ: Fundamental Ratings
BNNLF
CCJ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7859
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5025
SMR RATING
1..100
9087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1009
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNNLF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCJ (86) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that BNNLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCJ’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as BNNLF (50) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to BNNLF’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's SMR Rating (87) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as BNNLF (90) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to BNNLF’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as BNNLF (85) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to BNNLF’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew significantly faster than BNNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNNLFCCJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VOC2.820.14
+5.22%
VOC Energy Trust
JAMF11.180.09
+0.81%
Jamf Holding Corp
TFX129.890.82
+0.64%
Teleflex
ODC43.310.05
+0.12%
Oil-Dri Corporation Of America
NUWE0.93-0.01
-0.66%
Nuwellis Inc

BNNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNNLF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNNLF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNNLF
1D Price
Change %
BNNLF100%
+26.40%
UEC - BNNLF
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.85%
DYLLF - BNNLF
53%
Loosely correlated
+7.43%
DNN - BNNLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.65%
CCJ - BNNLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.58%
NXE - BNNLF
49%
Loosely correlated
+5.22%
More

CCJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCJ has been closely correlated with NXE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCJ jumps, then NXE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCJ
1D Price
Change %
CCJ100%
+5.58%
NXE - CCJ
83%
Closely correlated
+5.22%
DNN - CCJ
83%
Closely correlated
+5.65%
UEC - CCJ
78%
Closely correlated
+6.85%
UUUU - CCJ
74%
Closely correlated
+8.44%
UROY - CCJ
73%
Closely correlated
+11.69%
More