It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.62% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.13%.
BNS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
BNS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BNS | IMFL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago49% | 28 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago34% | 2 days ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been closely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL | 100% | -0.71% | ||
BAM - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
BHP - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
TD - IMFL | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
BN - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
BNS - IMFL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More |