Ad is loading...
BNS
Price
$53.93
Change
+$0.12 (+0.22%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
16 days until earnings call
NU
Price
$14.06
Change
-$1.13 (-7.44%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BNS vs NU

Header iconBNS vs NU Comparison
Open Charts BNS vs NUBanner chart's image
Bank of Nova Scotia
Price$53.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.22%)
Volume$927.82K
CapitalizationN/A
Nu Holdings
Price$14.06
Change-$1.13 (-7.44%)
Volume$49.95M
CapitalizationN/A
BNS vs NU Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNS vs. NU commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNS is a StrongSell and NU is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (BNS: $53.93 vs. NU: $14.06)
Brand notoriety: BNS and NU are both not notable
BNS represents the Major Banks, while NU is part of the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNS: 57% vs. NU: 179%
Market capitalization -- BNS: $63.25B vs. NU: $56.33B
BNS [@Major Banks] is valued at $63.25B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNS is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNS is a better buy in the short-term than NU.

Price Growth

BNS (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

NU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.47% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNS($63.2B) has a higher market cap than NU($56.3B). NU has higher P/E ratio than BNS: NU (55.73) vs BNS (11.14). NU YTD gains are higher at: 68.788 vs. BNS (10.762). NU has less debt than BNS: NU (1.12B) vs BNS (306B). BNS has higher revenues than NU: BNS (32.2B) vs NU (4.91B).
BNSNUBNS / NU
Capitalization63.2B56.3B112%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.76268.78816%
P/E Ratio11.1455.7320%
Revenue32.2B4.91B656%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt306B1.12B27,370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNS: Fundamental Ratings
BNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
2
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBIO2.280.13
+6.05%
iBio
SBAC221.092.62
+1.20%
SBA Communications Corp
MFIC13.750.14
+1.03%
MidCap Financial Investment Corp
KTOS24.42-0.86
-3.40%
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
BAER2.97-0.43
-12.65%
Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings

BNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNS has been closely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BNS jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNS
1D Price
Change %
BNS100%
+0.22%
BMO - BNS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
CM - BNS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
RY - BNS
74%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
TD - BNS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
EWBC - BNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-7.44%
INTR - NU
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
ITUB - NU
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CADE - NU
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BNS - NU
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
CIB - NU
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More