Ad is loading...
BOPAX vs FXAIX
BOPAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts BOPAX vs FXAIX
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
Price$23.30
Change+$0.26 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.52M
BOPAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOPAX vs. FXAIX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOPAX is a StrongBuy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. BOPAX (364M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than BOPAX: FXAIX (1.34) vs BOPAX (0.00). BOPAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: BOPAX (22 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). BOPAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). BOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.19 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BOPAX: FXAIX (0) vs BOPAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. BOPAX (-8.97). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. BOPAX (7.56).
| BOPAX | FXAIX | BOPAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 7,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 7,400% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.645 | -3.872 | 172% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 594B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | 10.00 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.01 | 47.66 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.56 | 107.31 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.13 | 192.42 | -1% |