Ad is loading...
BOPAX vs FXAIX
BOPAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts BOPAX vs FXAIX
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
Price$21.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.05M
BOPAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOPAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOPAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. BOPAX (351M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than BOPAX: FXAIX (1.30) vs BOPAX (0.00). BOPAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: BOPAX (22 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). BOPAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). BOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.19 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BOPAX: FXAIX (0) vs BOPAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.07 vs. BOPAX (-11.93). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.96 vs. BOPAX (9.52).
| BOPAX | FXAIX | BOPAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 7,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 7,400% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.467 | -8.490 | 135% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.93 | 6.07 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.76 | 27.80 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.52 | 107.96 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.47 | 181.98 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers