BOWN
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
95.42M
MANDF
Price
$6.38
Change
+$0.75 (+13.32%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWN vs MANDF

Header iconBOWN vs MANDF Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs MANDFBanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$10.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Volume$546
Capitalization95.42M
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$6.38
Change+$0.75 (+13.32%)
Volume$700
Capitalization3.36B
BOWN vs MANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. MANDF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and MANDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWN: $10.10 vs. MANDF: $6.38)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and MANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 5% vs. MANDF: 90%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. MANDF: $3.36B
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. MANDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $3.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMANDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than BOWN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOWN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOWN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MANDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the short-term than BOWN.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +16.16% price change this week, while MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +13.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF($3.36B) has a higher market cap than BOWN($95.4M). MANDF YTD gains are higher at: 41.778 vs. BOWN (-7.509). MANDF has more cash in the bank: 830M vs. BOWN (501K).
BOWNMANDFBOWN / MANDF
Capitalization95.4M3.36B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.50941.778-18%
P/E RatioN/A15.44-
RevenueN/A893M-
Total Cash501K830M0%
Total DebtN/A600M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWNMANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGWCX10.590.15
+1.44%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr C
RSECX17.040.14
+0.83%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
OIEQX25.650.11
+0.43%
JPMorgan Equity Income R4
COICX18.41-0.01
-0.05%
Calvert International Opportunities C
OANWX25.21-0.03
-0.12%
Oakmark Global Select Institutional

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOWN has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOWN jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
-0.98%
BOWNU - BOWN
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OAKU - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
HSPOU - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MANDF and NETD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANDF and NETD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
NETD - MANDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
BOWN - MANDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
KVAC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
RTGC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTUF - MANDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More