BOWN vs SPAQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and SPAQ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.23% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.18% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| SPAQ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 3% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WBIY | 29.94 | 0.39 | +1.32% |
| WBI Power Factor® High Dividend ETF | |||
| CZA | 105.72 | 1.05 | +1.01% |
| Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| RSPN | 50.94 | 0.50 | +0.99% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Indls ETF | |||
| WINC | 24.00 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Western Asset Short Duration Inc ETF | |||
| ICSH | 50.36 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond Active ETF | |||
BOWN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BOWN and OAKU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOWN and OAKU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOWN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOWN | 100% | N/A | ||
| OAKU - BOWN | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NPAB - BOWN | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETD - BOWN | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESHA - BOWN | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ALCYU - BOWN | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||