BPMC vs KRYS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPMC is a Hold and KRYS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKRYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BPMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KRYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BPMC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRYS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BPMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KRYS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BPMC (@Biotechnology) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while KRYS (@Biotechnology) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
BPMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
KRYS is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-2.20% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| BPMC | KRYS | BPMC / KRYS | |
| Capitalization | 5.73B | 4.74B | 121% |
| EBITDA | -75.58M | 181M | -42% |
| Gain YTD | -2.277 | 32.863 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 92.56 | - |
| Revenue | 434M | 242M | 179% |
| Total Cash | 734M | 588M | 125% |
| Total Debt | 471M | 7.48M | 6,300% |
BPMC | KRYS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BPMC's Valuation (80) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as KRYS (83) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew similarly to KRYS’s over the last 12 months.
KRYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPMC (80) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that KRYS’s stock grew significantly faster than BPMC’s over the last 12 months.
KRYS's SMR Rating (79) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BPMC (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that KRYS’s stock grew similarly to BPMC’s over the last 12 months.
KRYS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BPMC (59) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that KRYS’s stock grew similarly to BPMC’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as KRYS (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew similarly to KRYS’s over the last 12 months.
| BPMC | KRYS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FMAT | 48.66 | 0.51 | +1.05% |
| Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF | |||
| GCAD | 34.34 | 0.27 | +0.80% |
| Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Dfns ETF | |||
| HYLB | 36.26 | 0.21 | +0.58% |
| Xtrackers USD High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XTWY | 39.19 | 0.07 | +0.17% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg TwentyYrTrgDuUSTrETF | |||
| PCGG | 11.95 | 0.01 | +0.12% |
| Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | |||
BPMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPMC has been loosely correlated with BEAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPMC jumps, then BEAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPMC | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| BEAM - BPMC | 46% Loosely correlated | +8.04% | ||
| PDSB - BPMC | 45% Loosely correlated | -5.71% | ||
| KRYS - BPMC | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| PRME - BPMC | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.94% | ||
| DNLI - BPMC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
KRYS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRYS has been loosely correlated with CLDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRYS jumps, then CLDX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KRYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRYS | 100% | +2.49% | ||
| CLDX - KRYS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| BEAM - KRYS | 49% Loosely correlated | +8.04% | ||
| ZLDPF - KRYS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| BPMC - KRYS | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| RXRX - KRYS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||