It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNFA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BPMC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNFA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BPMC (@Biotechnology) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while TNFA (@Biotechnology) price change was -8.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +4.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.88%.
BPMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
TNFA is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
BPMC | TNFA | BPMC / TNFA | |
Capitalization | 8.27B | 1.8M | 459,411% |
EBITDA | -66.42M | -8.35M | 796% |
Gain YTD | 46.881 | -88.957 | -53% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 562M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 576M | 5.88M | 9,798% |
Total Debt | 467M | 2.68K | 17,438,387% |
BPMC | TNFA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TNFA's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPMC (82) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that TNFA’s stock grew significantly faster than BPMC’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNFA (100) in the null industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNFA’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's SMR Rating (96) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as TNFA (99) in the null industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew similarly to TNFA’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNFA (97) in the null industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNFA’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNFA (100) in the null industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNFA’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC | TNFA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BADGER.X | 1.002256 | 0.025890 | +2.65% |
Badger DAO cryptocurrency | |||
SNX.X | 0.578131 | 0.012993 | +2.30% |
Synthetix cryptocurrency | |||
RLC.X | 0.896586 | 0.009057 | +1.02% |
iExec RLC cryptocurrency | |||
AUTO.X | 6.275289 | 0.049525 | +0.80% |
Auto cryptocurrency | |||
ICP.X | 4.761958 | 0.031538 | +0.67% |
Internet Computer cryptocurrency |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPMC has been loosely correlated with KYMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPMC jumps, then KYMR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BPMC | 100% | -0.03% | ||
KYMR - BPMC | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
VERA - BPMC | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
NRIX - BPMC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
APLS - BPMC | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.27% | ||
IDYA - BPMC | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.04% | ||
More |