BQSSF
Price
$2.84
Change
-$0.19 (-6.27%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
700.39M
ELVUF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
56.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQSSF vs ELVUF

Header iconBQSSF vs ELVUF Comparison
Open Charts BQSSF vs ELVUFBanner chart's image
Boss Energy
Price$2.84
Change-$0.19 (-6.27%)
Volume$5.03K
Capitalization700.39M
Elevate Uranium
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$78K
Capitalization56.44M
BQSSF vs ELVUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQSSF vs. ELVUF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQSSF is a Hold and ELVUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BQSSF: $2.84 vs. ELVUF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: BQSSF and ELVUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQSSF: 19% vs. ELVUF: 218%
Market capitalization -- BQSSF: $700.39M vs. ELVUF: $56.44M
BQSSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $700.39M. ELVUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $56.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQSSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileELVUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BQSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ELVUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BQSSF and ELVUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQSSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELVUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ELVUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELVUF is a better buy in the short-term than BQSSF.

Price Growth

BQSSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while ELVUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

BQSSF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQSSF($700M) has a higher market cap than ELVUF($56.4M). BQSSF YTD gains are higher at: 83.819 vs. ELVUF (35.452). BQSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.1M vs. ELVUF (-7.52M). BQSSF has more cash in the bank: 20.9M vs. ELVUF (1.06M). ELVUF has less debt than BQSSF: ELVUF (65.2K) vs BQSSF (4M).
BQSSFELVUFBQSSF / ELVUF
Capitalization700M56.4M1,241%
EBITDA13.1M-7.52M-174%
Gain YTD83.81935.452236%
P/E Ratio71.43N/A-
RevenueN/A4.67K-
Total Cash20.9M1.06M1,966%
Total Debt4M65.2K6,135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELVUF: Fundamental Ratings
ELVUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQSSFELVUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIAGX17.950.27
+1.53%
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Inv
FATIX148.362.22
+1.52%
Fidelity Advisor Technology I
FAMWX106.680.86
+0.81%
FAM Value Institutional
APLIX12.330.08
+0.65%
Cavanal Hill Hedged Equity Income Inv
NREMX23.110.14
+0.61%
Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq R6

BQSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQSSF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQSSF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQSSF
1D Price
Change %
BQSSF100%
-6.27%
UEC - BQSSF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EU - BQSSF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
DNN - BQSSF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
NXE - BQSSF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
UROY - BQSSF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
More

ELVUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELVUF and CCJ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELVUF and CCJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELVUF
1D Price
Change %
ELVUF100%
N/A
CCJ - ELVUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
UEC - ELVUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UUUU - ELVUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
BQSSF - ELVUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
NXE - ELVUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More