Ad is loading...
BQSSF
Price
$1.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
TTSRF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

BQSSF vs TTSRF

Header iconBQSSF vs TTSRF Comparison
Open Charts BQSSF vs TTSRFBanner chart's image
Boss Energy
Price$1.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.37K
CapitalizationN/A
Tartisan Nickel
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
BQSSF vs TTSRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQSSF vs. TTSRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQSSF is a Hold and TTSRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BQSSF: $1.93 vs. TTSRF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: BQSSF and TTSRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQSSF: 104% vs. TTSRF: 16%
Market capitalization -- BQSSF: $700.39M vs. TTSRF: $8.19M
BQSSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $700.39M. TTSRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQSSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTSRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTSRF is a better buy in the long-term than BQSSF.

Price Growth

BQSSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while TTSRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQSSF($700M) has a higher market cap than TTSRF($8.19M). BQSSF has higher P/E ratio than TTSRF: BQSSF (71.43) vs TTSRF (6.34). TTSRF YTD gains are higher at: -10.000 vs. BQSSF (-29.891). BQSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.1M vs. TTSRF (-6.39M). BQSSF has more cash in the bank: 20.9M vs. TTSRF (4.61M). TTSRF has less debt than BQSSF: TTSRF (125K) vs BQSSF (4M).
BQSSFTTSRFBQSSF / TTSRF
Capitalization700M8.19M8,546%
EBITDA13.1M-6.39M-205%
Gain YTD-29.891-10.000299%
P/E Ratio71.436.341,126%
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash20.9M4.61M453%
Total Debt4M125K3,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TTSRF: Fundamental Ratings
TTSRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSAWX19.81-0.07
-0.35%
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp C
RYWTX61.18-0.50
-0.81%
Rydex Emerging Markets 2X Strategy A
ABSAX25.52-0.23
-0.89%
American Beacon Small Cp Val A
PHASX7.88-0.13
-1.62%
Principal MidCap Growth III R1
VLNPX48.48-1.11
-2.24%
Voya Small Cap Growth R6

BQSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQSSF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQSSF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQSSF
1D Price
Change %
BQSSF100%
+0.26%
UEC - BQSSF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
EU - BQSSF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
DNN - BQSSF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
NXE - BQSSF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UROY - BQSSF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
More

TTSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTSRF and EUMNF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTSRF and EUMNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTSRF
1D Price
Change %
TTSRF100%
N/A
EUMNF - TTSRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNCXF - TTSRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQSSF - TTSRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
SAVNF - TTSRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YWRLF - TTSRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More