BRAC
Price
$11.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:30 AM (EDT)
GIG
Price
$9.98
Change
-$0.12 (-1.19%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRAC vs GIG

Header iconBRAC vs GIG Comparison
Open Charts BRAC vs GIGBanner chart's image
Broad Capital Acquisition
Price$11.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GigCapital7
Price$9.98
Change-$0.12 (-1.19%)
Volume$662.45K
CapitalizationN/A
BRAC vs GIG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRAC vs. GIG commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRAC is a Buy and GIG is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BRAC: $11.73 vs. GIG: $9.98)
Brand notoriety: BRAC and GIG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRAC: 267% vs. GIG: 457%
Market capitalization -- BRAC: $53.02M vs. GIG: $50.8M
BRAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $53.02M. GIG’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $50.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGIG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRAC and GIG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRAC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BRAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

BRAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while GIG (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.86% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRAC($53M) and GIG($50.8M) have the same market capitalization . BRAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 143K vs. GIG (-9.23M). GIG has higher revenues than BRAC: GIG (336M) vs BRAC (0).
BRACGIGBRAC / GIG
Capitalization53M50.8M104%
EBITDA143K-9.23M-2%
Gain YTD5.581N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0336M-
Total Cash15.3KN/A-
Total Debt3.66MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VARBX10.52N/A
N/A
First Trust Merger Arbitrage Cl I
LHCAX20.01N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Health Care A
VEUAX30.81-0.76
-2.41%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic A
JLCVX80.66-2.61
-3.13%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
GUSYX20.37-0.80
-3.78%
Grandeur Peak US Stalwarts Institutional

GIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GIG has been loosely correlated with ATMV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GIG jumps, then ATMV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIG
1D Price
Change %
GIG100%
-1.19%
ATMV - GIG
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRC - GIG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRAC - GIG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOYA - GIG
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
GLACU - GIG
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More