BREUF
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.07 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
111.47M
LRE
Price
$1.64
Change
+$0.02 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BREUF vs LRE

Header iconBREUF vs LRE Comparison
Open Charts BREUF vs LREBanner chart's image
Bridgemarq Real Estate Svc
Price$10.75
Change-$0.07 (-0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization111.47M
Lead Real Estate
Price$1.64
Change+$0.02 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization55.25M
BREUF vs LRE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BREUF vs. LRE commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BREUF is a Hold and LRE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BREUF: $10.75 vs. LRE: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: BREUF and LRE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BREUF: 18% vs. LRE: 10%
Market capitalization -- BREUF: $111.47M vs. LRE: $55.25M
BREUF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $111.47M. LRE’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $55.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BREUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLRE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BREUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BREUF is a better buy in the long-term than LRE.

Price Growth

BREUF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while LRE (@Real Estate Development) price change was -7.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BREUF is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.34% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BREUF($111M) has a higher market cap than LRE($55.2M). BREUF has higher P/E ratio than LRE: BREUF (50.51) vs LRE (15.57). BREUF YTD gains are higher at: 2.014 vs. LRE (-12.437).
BREUFLREBREUF / LRE
Capitalization111M55.2M201%
EBITDA31.1MN/A-
Gain YTD2.014-12.437-16%
P/E Ratio50.5115.57324%
Revenue48.4MN/A-
Total Cash6.16MN/A-
Total Debt67MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BREUF: Fundamental Ratings
BREUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBP75.670.34
+0.45%
Invesco DB Precious Metals
AAAU32.930.10
+0.29%
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
FXC71.260.03
+0.04%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar
BFK9.48-0.03
-0.32%
BlackRock Municipal Income Trust
IWR90.57-0.77
-0.84%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

BREUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BREUF and HUFAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BREUF and HUFAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BREUF
1D Price
Change %
BREUF100%
-0.64%
HUFAF - BREUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRE - BREUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MODVF - BREUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VNNVF - BREUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
AYAAF - BREUF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LRE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRE and BREUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRE and BREUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRE
1D Price
Change %
LRE100%
-2.41%
BREUF - LRE
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
LPA - LRE
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
HHH - LRE
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
COMP - LRE
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
MRNO - LRE
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More