BRKH
Price
$11.55
Change
-$0.11 (-0.94%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
FORL
Price
$11.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRKH vs FORL

Header iconBRKH vs FORL Comparison
Open Charts BRKH vs FORLBanner chart's image
BurTech Acquisition
Price$11.55
Change-$0.11 (-0.94%)
Volume$22.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Four Leaf Acquisition
Price$11.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$102
CapitalizationN/A
BRKH vs FORL Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRKH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKH vs. FORL commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKH is a Buy and FORL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BRKH: $11.55 vs. FORL: $11.10)
Brand notoriety: BRKH and FORL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKH: 34% vs. FORL: 1%
Market capitalization -- BRKH: $166.03M vs. FORL: $73.23M
BRKH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $166.03M. FORL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $73.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFORL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRKH and FORL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FORL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRKH is a better buy in the short-term than FORL.

Price Growth

BRKH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRKH is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.78% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRKH($166M) has a higher market cap than FORL($73.2M). BRKH YTD gains are higher at: 8.667 vs. FORL (5.513).
BRKHFORLBRKH / FORL
Capitalization166M73.2M227%
EBITDA-2.96MN/A-
Gain YTD8.6675.513157%
P/E Ratio121.67N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash358N/A-
Total Debt100KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKHFORL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRKH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIERX8.02N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq A
IALAX40.29N/A
N/A
Transamerica Capital Growth A
JEEFX14.39-0.06
-0.42%
JHancock Infrastructure C
CNREX24.20-0.23
-0.94%
Commonwealth Real Estate Securities
VYMVX18.53-0.20
-1.07%
Voya Mid Cap Research Enhanced Index R

FORL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FORL and AFARU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORL and AFARU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORL
1D Price
Change %
FORL100%
N/A
AFARU - FORL
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLTYF - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKH - FORL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
TBMC - FORL
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
WINVU - FORL
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
More