BRLGF
Price
$6.55
Change
+$0.19 (+2.99%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
112.79M
CMPRF
Price
$2.02
Change
+$0.24 (+13.48%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRLGF vs CMPRF

Header iconBRLGF vs CMPRF Comparison
Open Charts BRLGF vs CMPRFBanner chart's image
DOMINION LENDING CTRS
Price$6.55
Change+$0.19 (+2.99%)
Volume$200
Capitalization112.79M
Gentera Sab De CV
Price$2.02
Change+$0.24 (+13.48%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization2.7B
BRLGF vs CMPRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRLGF vs. CMPRF commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRLGF is a StrongBuy and CMPRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BRLGF: $6.55 vs. CMPRF: $2.02)
Brand notoriety: BRLGF and CMPRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRLGF: 161% vs. CMPRF: 265%
Market capitalization -- BRLGF: $112.79M vs. CMPRF: $2.7B
BRLGF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $112.79M. CMPRF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRLGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMPRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMPRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPRF is a better buy in the long-term than BRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMPRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CMPRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRLGF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPRF.

Price Growth

BRLGF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while CMPRF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.88% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPRF($2.7B) has a higher market cap than BRLGF($113M). BRLGF has higher P/E ratio than CMPRF: BRLGF (3275.64) vs CMPRF (7.25). CMPRF YTD gains are higher at: 48.529 vs. BRLGF (16.548). BRLGF has less debt than CMPRF: BRLGF (41.7M) vs CMPRF (24.9B). CMPRF has higher revenues than BRLGF: CMPRF (30.6B) vs BRLGF (62.5M).
BRLGFCMPRFBRLGF / CMPRF
Capitalization113M2.7B4%
EBITDA25.7MN/A-
Gain YTD16.54848.52934%
P/E Ratio3275.647.2545,190%
Revenue62.5M30.6B0%
Total Cash5.61MN/A-
Total Debt41.7M24.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRLGF vs CMPRF: Fundamental Ratings
BRLGF
CMPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9446
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
108
SMR RATING
1..100
992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPRF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLGF (42). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew similarly to BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLGF (10). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew similarly to BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPRF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRLGF (99). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLGF (41). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew similarly to BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPRF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRLGF (100). This means that CMPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than BRLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRLGFCMPRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGLO0.200.04
+28.87%
theglobe.com, inc.
KONMY72.00N/A
N/A
Konami Group Corporation
SGHIF1.57N/A
N/A
Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd.
SNPMF0.54N/A
N/A
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
MBHCF1.00N/A
N/A
MBH Corporation PLC

BRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRLGF and FCMGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRLGF and FCMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLGF
1D Price
Change %
BRLGF100%
+2.99%
FCMGF - BRLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
TBCRF - BRLGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
BRRAY - BRLGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDIMF - BRLGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
CMPRF - BRLGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPRF has been loosely correlated with ACCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPRF jumps, then ACCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPRF
1D Price
Change %
CMPRF100%
N/A
ACCFF - CMPRF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ASHTY - CMPRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
FCMGF - CMPRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
ASHTF - CMPRF
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.34%
BDIMF - CMPRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
More