BRLXF
Price
$22.77
Change
-$0.13 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.65B
CGKEF
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRLXF vs CGKEF

Header iconBRLXF vs CGKEF Comparison
Open Charts BRLXF vs CGKEFBanner chart's image
Boralex
Price$22.77
Change-$0.13 (-0.57%)
Volume$54.84K
Capitalization2.65B
Chugoku Electric Power
Price$6.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$109
Capitalization2.53B
BRLXF vs CGKEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRLXF vs. CGKEF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRLXF is a Hold and CGKEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRLXF: $22.77 vs. CGKEF: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: BRLXF and CGKEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRLXF: 11% vs. CGKEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BRLXF: $2.65B vs. CGKEF: $2.53B
BRLXF [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $2.65B. CGKEF’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $2.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGKEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BRLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGKEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGKEF is a better buy in the long-term than BRLXF.

Price Growth

BRLXF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while CGKEF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (-0.03% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRLXF($2.65B) and CGKEF($2.53B) have the same market capitalization . CGKEF has higher P/E ratio than BRLXF: CGKEF (270.27) vs BRLXF (163.93). BRLXF YTD gains are higher at: 13.161 vs. CGKEF (0.000). BRLXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 499M vs. CGKEF (-226.06B). CGKEF has more cash in the bank: 200B vs. BRLXF (582M). BRLXF has less debt than CGKEF: BRLXF (3.69B) vs CGKEF (2.78T). CGKEF has higher revenues than BRLXF: CGKEF (1.55T) vs BRLXF (907M).
BRLXFCGKEFBRLXF / CGKEF
Capitalization2.65B2.53B105%
EBITDA499M-226.06B-0%
Gain YTD13.1610.000-
P/E Ratio163.93270.2761%
Revenue907M1.55T0%
Total Cash582M200B0%
Total Debt3.69B2.78T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRLXF vs CGKEF: Fundamental Ratings
BRLXF
CGKEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3136
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGKEF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRLXF (82). This means that CGKEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRLXF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CGKEF (100). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CGKEF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CGKEF (100). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CGKEF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CGKEF (71). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CGKEF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CGKEF (9). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CGKEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGDMX115.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA
MKVCX15.64N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value C
ALSAX9.60N/A
N/A
Alger Small Cap Growth A
EMSLX18.38N/A
N/A
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
ARAFX11.57N/A
N/A
Aristotle International Eq A

BRLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRLXF and NPIFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRLXF and NPIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLXF
1D Price
Change %
BRLXF100%
N/A
NPIFF - BRLXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
BEP - BRLXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
BEPC - BRLXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
INGXF - BRLXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWEN - BRLXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More

CGKEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGKEF has been loosely correlated with KAEPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGKEF jumps, then KAEPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGKEF
1D Price
Change %
CGKEF100%
N/A
KAEPF - CGKEF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLPXF - CGKEF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AWSL - CGKEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
CWPWF - CGKEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLXF - CGKEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More