BRLXF
Price
$21.05
Change
+$0.60 (+2.93%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CWPWF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRLXF vs CWPWF

Header iconBRLXF vs CWPWF Comparison
Open Charts BRLXF vs CWPWFBanner chart's image
Boralex
Price$21.05
Change+$0.60 (+2.93%)
Volume$175.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Concord New Energy Group
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
BRLXF vs CWPWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWPWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRLXF vs. CWPWF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRLXF is a StrongBuy and CWPWF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BRLXF: $21.05 vs. CWPWF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BRLXF and CWPWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRLXF: 23% vs. CWPWF: 36%
Market capitalization -- BRLXF: $2.65B vs. CWPWF: $696.39M
BRLXF [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $2.65B. CWPWF’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $696.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRLXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCWPWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CWPWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWPWF is a better buy in the long-term than BRLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRLXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWPWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRLXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CWPWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRLXF is a better buy in the short-term than CWPWF.

Price Growth

BRLXF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -1.64% price change this week, while CWPWF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (-3.22% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRLXF($2.65B) has a higher market cap than CWPWF($696M). BRLXF has higher P/E ratio than CWPWF: BRLXF (163.93) vs CWPWF (5.17). BRLXF YTD gains are higher at: -18.200 vs. CWPWF (-33.511). CWPWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. BRLXF (499M). CWPWF has more cash in the bank: 3.53B vs. BRLXF (582M). BRLXF has less debt than CWPWF: BRLXF (3.69B) vs CWPWF (12.6B). CWPWF has higher revenues than BRLXF: CWPWF (2.55B) vs BRLXF (907M).
BRLXFCWPWFBRLXF / CWPWF
Capitalization2.65B696M380%
EBITDA499M1.49B33%
Gain YTD-18.200-33.51154%
P/E Ratio163.935.173,169%
Revenue907M2.55B36%
Total Cash582M3.53B16%
Total Debt3.69B12.6B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRLXF vs CWPWF: Fundamental Ratings
BRLXF
CWPWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3292
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9464
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8191
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
757

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWPWF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRLXF (63). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRLXF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CWPWF (100). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CWPWF’s over the last 12 months.

CWPWF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLXF (94). This means that CWPWF’s stock grew similarly to BRLXF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CWPWF (91). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CWPWF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLXF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CWPWF (92). This means that BRLXF’s stock grew similarly to CWPWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRLXFCWPWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWPWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIGKX14.29N/A
N/A
Victory RS International R
GMEYX11.88N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Impact Equity Instl
SUWAX34.67-0.17
-0.49%
DWS Core Equity A
GEMNX24.33-0.12
-0.49%
GMO Emerging Markets R6
THOIX37.76-0.28
-0.74%
Thornburg Global Opportunities I

BRLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRLXF and NPIFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRLXF and NPIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLXF
1D Price
Change %
BRLXF100%
N/A
NPIFF - BRLXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
BEP - BRLXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
BEPC - BRLXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
INGXF - BRLXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
CWEN - BRLXF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More

CWPWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWPWF and CWEN have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWPWF and CWEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWPWF
1D Price
Change %
CWPWF100%
N/A
CWEN - CWPWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
BRLXF - CWPWF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEPC - CWPWF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
CGKEF - CWPWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLMOF - CWPWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More