It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEHTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHTH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRO (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while EHTH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -9.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.
BRO is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.
EHTH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
BRO | EHTH | BRO / EHTH | |
Capitalization | 24.6B | 174M | 14,138% |
EBITDA | 1.55B | 295K | 525,424% |
Gain YTD | 55.684 | -45.183 | -123% |
P/E Ratio | 28.30 | 37.17 | 76% |
Revenue | 4.2B | 453M | 927% |
Total Cash | 711M | 122M | 583% |
Total Debt | 4.02B | 103M | 3,903% |
BRO | EHTH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EHTH's Valuation (59) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRO (95) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that EHTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRO’s over the last 12 months.
BRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for EHTH (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that BRO’s stock grew significantly faster than EHTH’s over the last 12 months.
BRO's SMR Rating (50) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHTH (91) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that BRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHTH’s over the last 12 months.
BRO's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHTH (59) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that BRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHTH’s over the last 12 months.
EHTH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRO (55) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that EHTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRO’s over the last 12 months.
BRO | EHTH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago43% | 3 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago61% | 13 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago42% | 3 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago51% | 3 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRO has been closely correlated with MMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRO jumps, then MMC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EHTH and SLQT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHTH and SLQT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EHTH | 100% | -0.83% | ||
SLQT - EHTH | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
CRVL - EHTH | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
GOCO - EHTH | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.03% | ||
BRO - EHTH | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
WTW - EHTH | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
More |