Ad is loading...
BRSGF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
SII
Price
$41.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRSGF vs SII

Header iconBRSGF vs SII Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs SIIBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott
Price$41.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$104.81K
CapitalizationN/A
BRSGF vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. SII commentary
Nov 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $0.51 vs. SII: $41.99)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 238% vs. SII: 93%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $224.46M vs. SII: $964.89M
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $224.46M. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the long-term than BRSGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SII’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SII’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.73% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SII($965M) has a higher market cap than BRSGF($224M). SII has higher P/E ratio than BRSGF: SII (23.24) vs BRSGF (3.33). SII YTD gains are higher at: 25.970 vs. BRSGF (-7.091). SII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 57.2M vs. BRSGF (-30.08M). SII has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. BRSGF (12.9M). BRSGF has less debt than SII: BRSGF (367K) vs SII (24.2M). SII has higher revenues than BRSGF: SII (141M) vs BRSGF (-26.62M).
BRSGFSIIBRSGF / SII
Capitalization224M965M23%
EBITDA-30.08M57.2M-53%
Gain YTD-7.09125.970-27%
P/E Ratio3.3323.2414%
Revenue-26.62M141M-19%
Total Cash12.9M22.9M56%
Total Debt367K24.2M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6439
SMR RATING
1..100
2359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9949
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRSGF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (32). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSGF (64). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SII (59). This means that BRSGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSGF (60). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRSGF (99). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFSC58.83-0.25
-0.42%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
SON50.07-0.24
-0.48%
Sonoco Products Company
PCAR112.26-2.80
-2.43%
PACCAR
GAU1.41-0.06
-4.08%
Galiano Gold
CTSO0.89-0.05
-5.78%
Cytosorbents Corp

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRSGF and OWL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRSGF and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
OWL - BRSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
SII - BRSGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
AMDUF - BRSGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - BRSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AJMPF - BRSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
+0.21%
BN - SII
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
BAM - SII
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
BX - SII
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
NXDT - SII
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
More