BRWXF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
EMPPF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRWXF vs EMPPF

Header iconBRWXF vs EMPPF Comparison
Open Charts BRWXF vs EMPPFBanner chart's image
BRUNSWICK EXPL
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$15K
CapitalizationN/A
EMP Metals
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BRWXF vs EMPPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRWXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRWXF vs. EMPPF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWXF is a Hold and EMPPF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BRWXF: $0.11 vs. EMPPF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: BRWXF and EMPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRWXF: 37% vs. EMPPF: 1%
Market capitalization -- BRWXF: $114.25M vs. EMPPF: $26.39M
BRWXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $114.25M. EMPPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $26.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRWXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRWXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMPPF is a better buy in the long-term than BRWXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRWXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMPPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRWXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EMPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMPPF is a better buy in the short-term than BRWXF.

Price Growth

BRWXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.95% price change this week, while EMPPF (@Precious Metals) price change was +25.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRWXF($114M) has a higher market cap than EMPPF($26.4M). EMPPF YTD gains are higher at: -26.740 vs. BRWXF (-83.889). EMPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.77M vs. BRWXF (-5.92M). BRWXF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. EMPPF (156K). BRWXF (0) and EMPPF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BRWXFEMPPFBRWXF / EMPPF
Capitalization114M26.4M432%
EBITDA-5.92M-1.77M335%
Gain YTD-83.889-26.740314%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.5M156K10,577%
Total Debt343KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRWXFEMPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRWXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBIZ29.580.10
+0.34%
Global X E-commerce ETF
MRGR41.93N/A
N/A
ProShares Merger
JQUA59.14-0.30
-0.50%
JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF
FJP51.06-0.35
-0.68%
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF
ISCG51.84-0.59
-1.12%
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF

BRWXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRWXF and BKRRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRWXF and BKRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRWXF
1D Price
Change %
BRWXF100%
-3.81%
BKRRF - BRWXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
OCGSF - BRWXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
EXK - BRWXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
NGD - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
FSM - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More

EMPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMPPF and ENDGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMPPF and ENDGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMPPF
1D Price
Change %
EMPPF100%
+2.28%
ENDGF - EMPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKOF - EMPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
CYPMF - EMPPF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRWXF - EMPPF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
ESGLF - EMPPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-10.71%
More