Ad is loading...
BRWXF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
EMPPF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.02 (-7.41%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRWXF vs EMPPF

Header iconBRWXF vs EMPPF Comparison
Open Charts BRWXF vs EMPPFBanner chart's image
BRUNSWICK EXPL
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$3.5K
CapitalizationN/A
EMP Metals
Price$0.25
Change-$0.02 (-7.41%)
Volume$27.6K
CapitalizationN/A
BRWXF vs EMPPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRWXF vs. EMPPF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWXF is a Hold and EMPPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BRWXF: $0.14 vs. EMPPF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: BRWXF and EMPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRWXF: 6% vs. EMPPF: 270%
Market capitalization -- BRWXF: $114.25M vs. EMPPF: $26.39M
BRWXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $114.25M. EMPPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $26.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRWXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRWXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMPPF is a better buy in the long-term than BRWXF.

Price Growth

BRWXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while EMPPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRWXF($114M) has a higher market cap than EMPPF($26.4M). EMPPF YTD gains are higher at: -37.673 vs. BRWXF (-78.194). EMPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.77M vs. BRWXF (-5.92M). BRWXF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. EMPPF (156K). BRWXF (0) and EMPPF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BRWXFEMPPFBRWXF / EMPPF
Capitalization114M26.4M432%
EBITDA-5.92M-1.77M335%
Gain YTD-78.194-37.673208%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.5M156K10,577%
Total Debt343KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINO45.500.05
+0.11%
PIMCO Muncpl Income Oppos Act Ex-Trd
VONV84.71-0.36
-0.42%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
FFEB49.33-0.24
-0.49%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Feb
MINV27.71-0.30
-1.07%
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
QRMI17.04-0.24
-1.39%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Risk Mngd Inc ETF

BRWXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRWXF and BKRRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRWXF and BKRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRWXF
1D Price
Change %
BRWXF100%
+6.88%
BKRRF - BRWXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
OCGSF - BRWXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
EXK - BRWXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
NGD - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
FSM - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More

EMPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMPPF and ENDGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMPPF and ENDGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMPPF
1D Price
Change %
EMPPF100%
-8.15%
ENDGF - EMPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKOF - EMPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
CYPMF - EMPPF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRWXF - EMPPF
14%
Poorly correlated
+6.88%
ESGLF - EMPPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More