BSENF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
30.41M
FDCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
25.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSENF vs FDCFF

Header iconBSENF vs FDCFF Comparison
Open Charts BSENF vs FDCFFBanner chart's image
BASELODE ENERGY
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$132.54K
Capitalization30.41M
Forum Energy Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$188.18K
Capitalization25.26M
BSENF vs FDCFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSENF vs. FDCFF commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSENF is a Hold and FDCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BSENF: $0.09 vs. FDCFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: BSENF and FDCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSENF: 196% vs. FDCFF: 110%
Market capitalization -- BSENF: $30.41M vs. FDCFF: $25.26M
BSENF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $30.41M. FDCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $25.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFDCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FDCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSENF is a better buy in the long-term than FDCFF.

Price Growth

BSENF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.32% price change this week, while FDCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSENF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

FDCFF is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSENF($30.4M) has a higher market cap than FDCFF($25.3M). BSENF YTD gains are higher at: 46.624 vs. FDCFF (-5.197). FDCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.19M vs. BSENF (-18.2M). BSENF has more cash in the bank: 6.87M vs. FDCFF (243K). BSENF (0) and FDCFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BSENFFDCFFBSENF / FDCFF
Capitalization30.4M25.3M120%
EBITDA-18.2M-7.19M253%
Gain YTD46.624-5.197-897%
P/E Ratio10.93N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.87M243K2,825%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCFF: Fundamental Ratings
FDCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNC173.37-4.37
-2.46%
PNC Financial Services Group
JANX24.90-0.66
-2.58%
Janux Therapeutics
BOKF93.40-2.66
-2.77%
BOK Financial Corp
AXGN9.75-0.29
-2.89%
Axogen
TOON0.79-0.05
-5.92%
Kartoon Studios

BSENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSENF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSENF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSENF
1D Price
Change %
BSENF100%
-9.79%
UEC - BSENF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
EU - BSENF
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.78%
DNN - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
CCJ - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
NXE - BSENF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More

FDCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCFF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCFF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCFF
1D Price
Change %
FDCFF100%
-10.01%
UEC - FDCFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
DNN - FDCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
BSENF - FDCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-9.79%
UROY - FDCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
FUUFF - FDCFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.01%
More