BSENF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
30.41M
SMRVF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSENF vs SMRVF

Header iconBSENF vs SMRVF Comparison
Open Charts BSENF vs SMRVFBanner chart's image
BASELODE ENERGY
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.8K
Capitalization30.41M
Smooth Rock Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$241
Capitalization2.31M
BSENF vs SMRVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSENF vs. SMRVF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSENF is a Hold and SMRVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BSENF: $0.08 vs. SMRVF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BSENF and SMRVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSENF: 5% vs. SMRVF: 8%
Market capitalization -- BSENF: $30.41M vs. SMRVF: $2.31M
BSENF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $30.41M. SMRVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMRVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSENF is a better buy in the long-term than SMRVF.

Price Growth

BSENF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.20% price change this week, while SMRVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSENF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.21% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSENF($30.4M) has a higher market cap than SMRVF($2.31M). BSENF YTD gains are higher at: 30.547 vs. SMRVF (-23.200). SMRVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -220.05K vs. BSENF (-18.2M). BSENF has more cash in the bank: 6.87M vs. SMRVF (721K). BSENF (0) and SMRVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BSENFSMRVFBSENF / SMRVF
Capitalization30.4M2.31M1,315%
EBITDA-18.2M-220.05K8,273%
Gain YTD30.547-23.200-132%
P/E Ratio10.93N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.87M721K952%
Total DebtN/A237K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMRVF: Fundamental Ratings
SMRVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TT424.86-4.94
-1.15%
Trane Technologies plc
JRVR5.27-0.12
-2.23%
James River Group Holdings Ltd
SWVL4.74-0.13
-2.57%
Swvl Holdings Corp
TVTX16.60-0.96
-5.47%
Travere Therapeutics
VFC12.15-2.28
-15.80%
VF Corp

BSENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSENF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSENF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSENF
1D Price
Change %
BSENF100%
-3.33%
UEC - BSENF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
EU - BSENF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
DNN - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.83%
CCJ - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
NXE - BSENF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More

SMRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMRVF and GTMLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMRVF and GTMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMRVF
1D Price
Change %
SMRVF100%
N/A
GTMLF - SMRVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASMMF - SMRVF
10%
Poorly correlated
-8.54%
AAGFF - SMRVF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.54%
BSENF - SMRVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
CPPKF - SMRVF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More