BSENF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.41M
SMRVF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSENF vs SMRVF

Header iconBSENF vs SMRVF Comparison
Open Charts BSENF vs SMRVFBanner chart's image
BASELODE ENERGY
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization30.41M
Smooth Rock Ventures
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization2.31M
BSENF vs SMRVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSENF vs. SMRVF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSENF is a Hold and SMRVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BSENF: $0.07 vs. SMRVF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: BSENF and SMRVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSENF: 6% vs. SMRVF: 105%
Market capitalization -- BSENF: $30.41M vs. SMRVF: $2.31M
BSENF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $30.41M. SMRVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMRVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BSENF and SMRVF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSENF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMRVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSENF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMRVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BSENF and SMRVF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BSENF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -13.13% price change this week, while SMRVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSENF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSENF($30.4M) has a higher market cap than SMRVF($2.31M). SMRVF YTD gains are higher at: 19.840 vs. BSENF (13.826). SMRVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -220.05K vs. BSENF (-18.2M). BSENF has more cash in the bank: 6.87M vs. SMRVF (721K). BSENF (0) and SMRVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BSENFSMRVFBSENF / SMRVF
Capitalization30.4M2.31M1,315%
EBITDA-18.2M-220.05K8,273%
Gain YTD13.82619.84070%
P/E Ratio10.93N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.87M721K952%
Total DebtN/A237K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMRVF: Fundamental Ratings
SMRVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSENFSMRVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMMS2.55N/A
N/A
Emmis Corporation
MCAP10.00N/A
N/A
MCAP Inc.
NSFMF11.50N/A
N/A
NISSHIN SEIFUN GROUP INC
KWTEF15.43N/A
N/A
KIWETINOHK ENERGY CORP
BOUYF36.63N/A
N/A
Bouygues SA

BSENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSENF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSENF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSENF
1D Price
Change %
BSENF100%
-3.93%
UEC - BSENF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
EU - BSENF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
DNN - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
CCJ - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
NXE - BSENF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
More

SMRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMRVF and GTMLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMRVF and GTMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMRVF
1D Price
Change %
SMRVF100%
N/A
GTMLF - SMRVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASMMF - SMRVF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.52%
AAGFF - SMRVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
BSENF - SMRVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
CPPKF - SMRVF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
More