BSENF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
30.41M
WDFCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.34M
Ad is loading...

BSENF vs WDFCF

Header iconBSENF vs WDFCF Comparison
Open Charts BSENF vs WDFCFBanner chart's image
BASELODE ENERGY
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$297.28K
Capitalization30.41M
K9 Gold
Price$0.07
Change+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Volume$25.34K
Capitalization1.34M
BSENF vs WDFCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSENF vs. WDFCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSENF is a Hold and WDFCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BSENF: $0.07 vs. WDFCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: BSENF and WDFCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSENF: 170% vs. WDFCF: 337%
Market capitalization -- BSENF: $30.41M vs. WDFCF: $1.34M
BSENF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $30.41M. WDFCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WDFCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSENF is a better buy in the long-term than WDFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSENF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSENF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WDFCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDFCF is a better buy in the short-term than BSENF.

Price Growth

BSENF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while WDFCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +32.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSENF($30.4M) has a higher market cap than WDFCF($1.34M). WDFCF YTD gains are higher at: 36.986 vs. BSENF (6.270).
BSENFWDFCFBSENF / WDFCF
Capitalization30.4M1.34M2,275%
EBITDA-18.2MN/A-
Gain YTD6.27036.98617%
P/E Ratio10.93N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash6.87MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDFCF: Fundamental Ratings
WDFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSENFWDFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
88%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIRGX40.830.25
+0.62%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R2
BBTSX12.850.06
+0.47%
Bridge Builder Tax Managed Sm/Md Cp
AGSCX6.470.02
+0.31%
Alger Small Cap Growth C
FCIKX16.42N/A
N/A
NYLI PineStone International Eq Inv Cl
ARSYX14.12-0.02
-0.14%
AB Global Real Estate Investment Advisor

BSENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSENF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSENF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSENF
1D Price
Change %
BSENF100%
-5.57%
UEC - BSENF
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
EU - BSENF
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
DNN - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
CCJ - BSENF
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.28%
NXE - BSENF
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
More

WDFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFCF and SMDZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFCF and SMDZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFCF
1D Price
Change %
WDFCF100%
+33.33%
SMDZF - WDFCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.49%
BCUFF - WDFCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
BSENF - WDFCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
WHYRF - WDFCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.32%
MP - WDFCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More