Ad is loading...
BSICX vs CUBRX
BSICX vs CUBRX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBRX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.07B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class R6
Price$14.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.13M
BSICX vs CUBRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBRX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 41.1B vs. CUBRX (632M). CUBRX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBRX (5.42) vs BSICX (3.84). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBRX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBRX (6 years). BSICX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CUBRX (0.58). BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1005.00 vs. CUBRX (450.00). BSICX has a lower initial minimum investment than CUBRX: BSICX (1000) vs CUBRX (5000000). CUBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. BSICX (7.20). CUBRX return over 5 years is better than : 29.44 vs. BSICX (13.91).
| BSICX | CUBRX | BSICX / CUBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.58 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.58 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 1.839 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1B | 632M | 6,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 5.42 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 8.20 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 16.04 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.91 | 29.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers