Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs CUBRX
BSICX vs CUBRX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBRX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.96B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class R6
Price$14.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.91M
BSICX vs CUBRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. CUBRX (642M). CUBRX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBRX (5.33) vs BSICX (3.76). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBRX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBRX (6 years). BSICX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CUBRX (0.61). BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBRX (450.00). BSICX has a lower initial minimum investment than CUBRX: BSICX (1000) vs CUBRX (5000000). CUBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. BSICX (6.18). CUBRX return over 5 years is better than : 26.66 vs. BSICX (11.75).
| BSICX | CUBRX | BSICX / CUBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.57 | 296% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.61 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.957 | 3.282 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42B | 642M | 6,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 5.33 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 7.18 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.60 | 19.92 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.75 | 26.66 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers