Ad is loading...
BSIKX vs CUBAX
BSIKX vs CUBAX Comparison
Open Charts BSIKX vs CUBAX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps K
Price$9.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.13M
BSIKX vs CUBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSIKX vs. CUBAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSIKX is a Hold and CUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSIKX has more cash in the bank: 41.1B vs. CUBAX (632M). CUBAX (5.08) and BSIKX (4.91) have matching dividends . BSIKX was incepted earlier than CUBAX: BSIKX (9 years) vs CUBAX (11 years). CUBAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than BSIKX (0.66). BSIKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBAX (450.00). CUBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSIKX: CUBAX (1000) vs BSIKX (5000000). BSIKX (8.24) and CUBAX (7.90) have marching annual gain over last year. CUBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.94 vs. BSIKX (19.96).
| BSIKX | CUBAX | BSIKX / CUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.92 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.976 | 1.961 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1B | 632M | 6,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.91 | 5.08 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 7.90 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.74 | 15.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.96 | 26.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...