BSPA
Price
$58.16
Change
-$1.77 (-2.95%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
22.33M
NWYF
Price
$35.50
Change
-$0.14 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
50.22M
Ad is loading...

BSPA vs NWYF

Header iconBSPA vs NWYF Comparison
Open Charts BSPA vs NWYFBanner chart's image
Ballston Spa Ban
Price$58.16
Change-$1.77 (-2.95%)
Volume$5.12K
Capitalization22.33M
Northway Financial
Price$35.50
Change-$0.14 (-0.39%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.22M
BSPA vs NWYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSPA vs. NWYF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSPA is a Hold and NWYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BSPA: $58.16 vs. NWYF: $35.50)
Brand notoriety: BSPA and NWYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSPA: 225% vs. NWYF: 6%
Market capitalization -- BSPA: $22.33M vs. NWYF: $50.22M
BSPA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.33M. NWYF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSPA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSPA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSPA is a better buy in the long-term than NWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSPA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSPA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NWYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BSPA and NWYF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BSPA (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWYF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWYF($50.2M) has a higher market cap than BSPA($22.3M). BSPA YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. NWYF (-0.393). NWYF has less debt than BSPA: NWYF (20.6M) vs BSPA (57.8M). NWYF has higher revenues than BSPA: NWYF (39.4M) vs BSPA (13.2M).
BSPANWYFBSPA / NWYF
Capitalization22.3M50.2M44%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-0.393-
P/E RatioN/A18.66-
Revenue13.2M39.4M34%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt57.8M20.6M281%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSPA vs NWYF: Fundamental Ratings
BSPA
NWYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5665
SMR RATING
1..100
5255
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4570
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSPA's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWYF (65). This means that BSPA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWYF’s over the last 12 months.

BSPA's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as NWYF (65). This means that BSPA’s stock grew similarly to NWYF’s over the last 12 months.

BSPA's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NWYF (55). This means that BSPA’s stock grew similarly to NWYF’s over the last 12 months.

NWYF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BSPA (50). This means that NWYF’s stock grew similarly to BSPA’s over the last 12 months.

BSPA's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NWYF (70). This means that BSPA’s stock grew similarly to NWYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSPANWYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
BTC.X104408.070000-53.968750
-0.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

BSPA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSPA has been loosely correlated with SYBJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSPA jumps, then SYBJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSPA
1D Price
Change %
BSPA100%
N/A
SYBJF - BSPA
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKALF - BSPA
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNAT - BSPA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
NWYF - BSPA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKUT - BSPA
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More

NWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWYF has been loosely correlated with EVBN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWYF jumps, then EVBN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWYF
1D Price
Change %
NWYF100%
N/A
EVBN - NWYF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
IBCP - NWYF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
OVLY - NWYF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
ISTR - NWYF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
CIBN - NWYF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More