BSVN
Price
$43.77
Change
+$0.19 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
258.16M
83 days until earnings call
FBMS
Price
$39.08
Change
+$0.38 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:39 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
796.94M
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BSVN vs FBMS

Header iconBSVN vs FBMS Comparison
Open Charts BSVN vs FBMSBanner chart's image
Bank7
Price$43.77
Change+$0.19 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization258.16M
First Bancshares
Price$39.08
Change+$0.38 (+0.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization796.94M
BSVN vs FBMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSVN vs. FBMS commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSVN is a Buy and FBMS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (BSVN: $43.58 vs. FBMS: $38.70)
Brand notoriety: BSVN and FBMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSVN: 59% vs. FBMS: 148%
Market capitalization -- BSVN: $258.16M vs. FBMS: $796.94M
BSVN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $258.16M. FBMS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $796.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BSVN and FBMS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSVN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBMS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSVN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FBMS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBMS is a better buy in the short-term than BSVN.

Price Growth

BSVN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while FBMS (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSVN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

FBMS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMS($797M) has a higher market cap than BSVN($258M). FBMS has higher P/E ratio than BSVN: FBMS (10.68) vs BSVN (9.16). FBMS YTD gains are higher at: 10.571 vs. BSVN (-6.601). BSVN has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. FBMS (122M). BSVN has less debt than FBMS: BSVN (4.8M) vs FBMS (132M). FBMS has higher revenues than BSVN: FBMS (290M) vs BSVN (91.8M).
BSVNFBMSBSVN / FBMS
Capitalization258M797M32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.60110.571-62%
P/E Ratio9.1610.6886%
Revenue91.8M290M32%
Total Cash169M122M139%
Total Debt4.8M132M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSVN vs FBMS: Fundamental Ratings
BSVN
FBMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
324
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1057
SMR RATING
1..100
2618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBMS's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSVN (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBMS (57) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's SMR Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSVN (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSVN (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSVN (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSVNFBMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DISYX23.670.22
+0.94%
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Y
JSIVX24.590.20
+0.82%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value L
MLUNX11.06N/A
N/A
MassMutual Mid Cap Value R3
FICHX13.36N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
FWMNX17.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership I

BSVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSVN has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSVN jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSVN
1D Price
Change %
BSVN100%
+0.18%
EFSC - BSVN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
MCBS - BSVN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
FFBC - BSVN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
NWBI - BSVN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
FBMS - BSVN
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
More

FBMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBMS has been closely correlated with TRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBMS jumps, then TRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBMS
1D Price
Change %
FBMS100%
+3.23%
TRST - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
FRME - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
+3.51%
HFWA - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
WASH - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
UBSI - FBMS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More