BSXGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
22.31M
VLMGF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
13M
Ad is loading...

BSXGF vs VLMGF

Header iconBSXGF vs VLMGF Comparison
Open Charts BSXGF vs VLMGFBanner chart's image
Belo Sun Mining
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$906.11K
Capitalization22.31M
Viscount Mining
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization13M
BSXGF vs VLMGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSXGF vs. VLMGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSXGF is a Hold and VLMGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BSXGF: $0.06 vs. VLMGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: BSXGF and VLMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSXGF: 181% vs. VLMGF: 36%
Market capitalization -- BSXGF: $22.31M vs. VLMGF: $13M
BSXGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.31M. VLMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSXGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSXGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSXGF is a better buy in the long-term than VLMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSXGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSXGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLMGF is a better buy in the short-term than BSXGF.

Price Growth

BSXGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.88% price change this week, while VLMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSXGF($22.3M) has a higher market cap than VLMGF($13M). VLMGF YTD gains are higher at: 1.458 vs. BSXGF (-1.230). VLMGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65M vs. BSXGF (-12.72M). BSXGF has more cash in the bank: 18.2M vs. VLMGF (483K). BSXGF has less debt than VLMGF: BSXGF (2.63K) vs VLMGF (12.7K). BSXGF (0) and VLMGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BSXGFVLMGFBSXGF / VLMGF
Capitalization22.3M13M172%
EBITDA-12.72M-1.65M770%
Gain YTD-1.2301.458-84%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash18.2M483K3,768%
Total Debt2.63K12.7K21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSXGF vs VLMGF: Fundamental Ratings
BSXGF
VLMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSXGF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMGF (50). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMGF (100). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BSXGF (97). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to BSXGF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLMGF (79). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

BSXGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMGF (100). This means that BSXGF’s stock grew similarly to VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSXGFVLMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFAFX24.810.12
+0.49%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F1
IHOTX19.440.08
+0.41%
Hartford International Opportunities R5
MSEFX11.740.04
+0.34%
iMGP Global Select Instl
SPWYX15.270.04
+0.26%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Y
RRRZX21.71-0.03
-0.14%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities R6

BSXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSXGF and ORLA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSXGF and ORLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSXGF
1D Price
Change %
BSXGF100%
+2.55%
ORLA - BSXGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
EREPF - BSXGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRD - BSXGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
MRZLF - BSXGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCANF - BSXGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
More

VLMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMGF and LVGLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMGF and LVGLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMGF
1D Price
Change %
VLMGF100%
N/A
LVGLF - VLMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
VLMZF - VLMGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGGOF - VLMGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSXGF - VLMGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
GSVRF - VLMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More