33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTAL vs MCK
BTAL vs MCK Comparison
Open Charts BTAL vs MCK
AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta
Price$17.78
Change-$0.16 (-0.89%)
Volume$579
Net Assets284.11M
McKesson
Price$721.73
Change+$3.32 (+0.46%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization70.55B
BTAL vs MCK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTAL vs. MCK commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTAL is a Hold and MCK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCK: Fundamental Ratings
MCK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BTAL | MCK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BTAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTAL has been loosely correlated with MCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTAL jumps, then MCK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTAL | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| MCK - BTAL | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MO - BTAL | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| CBOE - BTAL | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
| PGR - BTAL | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| COR - BTAL | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||
MCK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCK has been loosely correlated with COR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCK jumps, then COR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCK | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| COR - MCK | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| CAH - MCK | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| OMI - MCK | 9% Poorly correlated | +5.98% | ||
| SHTDF - MCK | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HSIC - MCK | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||