It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYOSH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YOSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BTBD (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while YOSH (@Restaurants) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.06%.
BTBD is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2023.
YOSH is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
BTBD | YOSH | BTBD / YOSH | |
Capitalization | 10.2M | 5.45M | 187% |
EBITDA | -752.99K | -1.8M | 42% |
Gain YTD | -34.400 | -30.387 | 113% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 14.6M | 10.7M | 136% |
Total Cash | 5.06M | 1.19M | 423% |
Total Debt | 4.17M | 15.5M | 27% |
BTBD | YOSH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago75% | 8 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago83% | 3 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GSVCX | 15.03 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C | |||
NUIIX | 28.78 | -0.07 | -0.24% |
Nuveen International Dividend Growth I | |||
AMIDX | 13.54 | -0.12 | -0.88% |
Amana Developing World Institutional | |||
PSSMX | 30.11 | -0.42 | -1.38% |
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R3 | |||
JCNNX | 28.29 | -0.47 | -1.63% |
Janus Henderson Contrarian N |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTBD and JDWPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTBD and JDWPF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BTBD | 100% | +4.41% | ||
JDWPF - BTBD | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ARKR - BTBD | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
YOSH - BTBD | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
TNGPF - BTBD | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KRUS - BTBD | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that YOSH and PTLO have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YOSH and PTLO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YOSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YOSH | 100% | +2.16% | ||
PTLO - YOSH | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
YUMC - YOSH | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
THCH - YOSH | 10% Poorly correlated | +10.99% | ||
CAVA - YOSH | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
BTBD - YOSH | 8% Poorly correlated | +4.41% | ||
More |