Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FCSDX
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FCSDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$61.72
Change-$0.55 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets546.25M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.06
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. BTBFX (546M). FCSDX (1.47) and BTBFX (1.46) have matching dividends . BTBFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FCSDX (21 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FCSDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. BTBFX (0.80). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 30.04 vs. BTBFX (28.21).
| BTBFX | FCSDX | BTBFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.162 | 2.829 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 5.13B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.47 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 5.98 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.74 | 19.32 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | 30.04 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.46 | 32.28 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers