Ad is loading...
BTBFX vs FCSDX
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FCSDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$60.09
Change+$0.21 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets533.12M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$16.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FCSDX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. BTBFX (533M). BTBFX (1.50) and FCSDX (1.50) have matching dividends . BTBFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: BTBFX (29 years) vs FCSDX (21 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.82). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FCSDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.33 vs. BTBFX (-0.33). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 30.24 vs. BTBFX (26.66).
| BTBFX | FCSDX | BTBFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.824 | 0.297 | -949% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 5.03B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.50 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.33 | 4.33 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.37 | 10.70 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 30.24 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.06 | 27.59 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...