Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FCSDX
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FCSDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$64.20
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.92M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
BTBFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. BTBFX (560M). FCSDX (1.44) and BTBFX (1.43) have matching dividends . BTBFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FCSDX (22 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FCSDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. BTBFX (4.81). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 29.33 vs. BTBFX (27.20).
| BTBFX | FCSDX | BTBFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.749 | 6.612 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 5.21B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.44 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | 7.62 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 18.11 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.20 | 29.33 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.38 | 38.41 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers