Ad is loading...
BTBFX vs FSIDX
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FSIDX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$60.09
Change+$0.21 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets533.12M
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$16.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
BTBFX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FSIDX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. BTBFX (533M). FSIDX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FSIDX (2.53) vs BTBFX (1.50). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: BTBFX (29 years) vs FSIDX (21 years). BTBFX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FSIDX (0) vs BTBFX (100000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. BTBFX (-0.33). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. BTBFX (26.66).
| BTBFX | FSIDX | BTBFX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.67 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.67 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.824 | 0.616 | -459% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 5.03B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.53 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.33 | 5.39 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.37 | 14.07 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 37.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.06 | 37.40 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...