BTBIF
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.05 (+1.89%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
NSA
Price
$44.83
Change
+$0.11 (+0.25%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:31 AM (EDT)
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BTBIF vs NSA

Header iconBTBIF vs NSA Comparison
Open Charts BTBIF vs NSABanner chart's image
BTB Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$2.70
Change+$0.05 (+1.89%)
Volume$950
CapitalizationN/A
National Storage Affiliates Trust
Price$44.83
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BTBIF vs NSA Comparison Chart
Loading...
NSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BTBIF vs. NSA commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBIF is a Hold and NSA is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BTBIF: $2.70 vs. NSA: $44.72)
Brand notoriety: BTBIF and NSA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTBIF: 31% vs. NSA: 50%
Market capitalization -- BTBIF: $213.53M vs. NSA: $3.06B
BTBIF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $213.53M. NSA’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTBIF is a better buy in the long-term than NSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BTBIF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while NSA (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSA is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.34% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSA($3.07B) has a higher market cap than BTBIF($214M). NSA has higher P/E ratio than BTBIF: NSA (25.89) vs BTBIF (6.71). BTBIF YTD gains are higher at: 22.591 vs. NSA (12.267). NSA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 627M vs. BTBIF (72M). NSA has more cash in the bank: 65M vs. BTBIF (1.67M). BTBIF has less debt than NSA: BTBIF (722M) vs NSA (3.68B). NSA has higher revenues than BTBIF: NSA (858M) vs BTBIF (123M).
BTBIFNSABTBIF / NSA
Capitalization214M3.07B7%
EBITDA72M627M11%
Gain YTD22.59112.267184%
P/E Ratio6.7125.8926%
Revenue123M858M14%
Total Cash1.67M65M3%
Total Debt722M3.68B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTBIF vs NSA: Fundamental Ratings
BTBIF
NSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9565
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
8058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3475
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTBIF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSA (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BTBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSA’s over the last 12 months.

NSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTBIF (100) in the null industry. This means that NSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

NSA's SMR Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BTBIF (80) in the null industry. This means that NSA’s stock grew similarly to BTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

BTBIF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as NSA (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BTBIF’s stock grew similarly to NSA’s over the last 12 months.

BTBIF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSA (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BTBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTBIF and PCH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTBIF and PCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTBIF
1D Price
Change %
BTBIF100%
N/A
PCH - BTBIF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
RWT - BTBIF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
DREUF - BTBIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSA - BTBIF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
MAC - BTBIF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More

NSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSA has been closely correlated with CUBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NSA jumps, then CUBE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSA
1D Price
Change %
NSA100%
-0.97%
CUBE - NSA
85%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
PSA - NSA
83%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
EXR - NSA
83%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
ARE - NSA
73%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
BXP - NSA
68%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
More