BTLLF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.04 (-8.51%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
KSKGF
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.08 (-8.42%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTLLF vs KSKGF

Header iconBTLLF vs KSKGF Comparison
Open Charts BTLLF vs KSKGFBanner chart's image
North Peak Resources
Price$0.43
Change-$0.04 (-8.51%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Kingsgate Consolidated
Price$0.87
Change-$0.08 (-8.42%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
BTLLF vs KSKGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTLLF vs. KSKGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLLF is a Hold and KSKGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BTLLF: $0.43 vs. KSKGF: $0.87)
Brand notoriety: BTLLF and KSKGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTLLF: 41% vs. KSKGF: 95%
Market capitalization -- BTLLF: $27.27M vs. KSKGF: $213.73M
BTLLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.27M. KSKGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $213.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKSKGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KSKGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSKGF is a better buy in the long-term than BTLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTLLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KSKGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTLLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KSKGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTLLF is a better buy in the short-term than KSKGF.

Price Growth

BTLLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.14% price change this week, while KSKGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KSKGF($214M) has a higher market cap than BTLLF($27.3M). KSKGF YTD gains are higher at: -4.081 vs. BTLLF (-63.595). BTLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.75M vs. KSKGF (-32.95M). KSKGF has more cash in the bank: 15.6M vs. BTLLF (7.66M). BTLLF has less debt than KSKGF: BTLLF (49.7K) vs KSKGF (12.7M). KSKGF has higher revenues than BTLLF: KSKGF (176M) vs BTLLF (0).
BTLLFKSKGFBTLLF / KSKGF
Capitalization27.3M214M13%
EBITDA-2.75M-32.95M8%
Gain YTD-63.595-4.0811,558%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0176M-
Total Cash7.66M15.6M49%
Total Debt49.7K12.7M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTLLF vs KSKGF: Fundamental Ratings
BTLLF
KSKGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6492
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9452
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8883
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSKGF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTLLF (92). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTLLF (94). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

BTLLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as KSKGF (98). This means that BTLLF’s stock grew similarly to KSKGF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's Price Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLLF (88). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew similarly to BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTLLF (100). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew similarly to BTLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTLLFKSKGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BTLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGZ108.640.15
+0.14%
iShares Agency Bond ETF
DFCF41.64-0.03
-0.07%
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
SPXN65.11-0.19
-0.29%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Financials
NDVG33.50-0.19
-0.56%
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
NBCM21.79-0.16
-0.73%
Neuberger Berman Commodity Stgy ETF

BTLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTLLF and PZG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTLLF and PZG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTLLF
1D Price
Change %
BTLLF100%
-9.37%
PZG - BTLLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
TRX - BTLLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
ELRRF - BTLLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
FYMNF - BTLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSKGF - BTLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KSKGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KSKGF has been loosely correlated with DBORF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KSKGF jumps, then DBORF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSKGF
1D Price
Change %
KSKGF100%
N/A
DBORF - KSKGF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHPGF - KSKGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.70%
GRYCF - KSKGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSXLF - KSKGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
BTLLF - KSKGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.37%
More