Ad is loading...
BTLSX vs RERBX
BTLSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BTLSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsInstl
Price$7.89
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$54.69
Change-$0.20 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BTLSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLSX vs. RERBX commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLSX is a Hold and RERBX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. BTLSX (84M). RERBX pays higher dividends than BTLSX: RERBX (1.00) vs BTLSX (0.00). BTLSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BTLSX (7 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. BTLSX (28.00). BTLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BTLSX (0) vs RERBX (250). BTLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.47 vs. RERBX (7.60). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 4.59 vs. BTLSX (-36.82).
| BTLSX | RERBX | BTLSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.668 | 5.468 | 433% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.47 | 7.60 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.20 | -6.94 | 478% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.82 | 4.59 | -802% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.32 | - |