Ad is loading...
BTLSX vs RERBX
BTLSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BTLSX vs RERBX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsInstl
Price$7.54
Change-$0.30 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.96M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$51.09
Change-$1.48 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.35B
BTLSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLSX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLSX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. BTLSX (85M). RERBX pays higher dividends than BTLSX: RERBX (0.48) vs BTLSX (0.00). BTLSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BTLSX (7 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BTLSX (0.99). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BTLSX (28.00). BTLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: BTLSX (0) vs RERBX (250). BTLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. RERBX (-7.78). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. BTLSX (-30.53).
| BTLSX | RERBX | BTLSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.56 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.56 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.132 | 0.472 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85M | 125B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | -7.78 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.62 | -6.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.53 | 31.66 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...