BTOC
Price
$1.54
Change
-$0.01 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jun 27, 12:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SFWL
Price
$0.99
Change
+$0.02 (+2.06%)
Updated
Jun 27, 01:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
139.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTOC vs SFWL

Header iconBTOC vs SFWL Comparison
Open Charts BTOC vs SFWLBanner chart's image
Armlogi Holding
Price$1.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.65%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Shengfeng Development
Price$0.99
Change+$0.02 (+2.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization139.26M
BTOC vs SFWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTOC vs. SFWL commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTOC is a Buy and SFWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BTOC: $1.55 vs. SFWL: $0.97)
Brand notoriety: BTOC and SFWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTOC: 24% vs. SFWL: 249%
Market capitalization -- BTOC: $0 vs. SFWL: $139.26M
BTOC [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $0. SFWL’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $139.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $126.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $13.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTOC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFWL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTOC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFWL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTOC is a better buy in the long-term than SFWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTOC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFWL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFWL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTOC is a better buy in the short-term than SFWL.

Price Growth

BTOC (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -6.63% price change this week, while SFWL (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTOC is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

SFWL is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+1.20% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFWL YTD gains are higher at: -10.194 vs. BTOC (-62.651).
BTOCSFWLBTOC / SFWL
CapitalizationN/A139M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-62.651-10.194615%
P/E RatioN/A13.23-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTOCSFWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMGRX23.460.14
+0.60%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R
RSMRX15.23N/A
N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth R6
EEMFX8.97N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R3
TFFYX77.28N/A
N/A
Touchstone Focused Y
MNHCX25.81N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L

BTOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTOC and RLGT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTOC and RLGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTOC
1D Price
Change %
BTOC100%
+1.97%
RLGT - BTOC
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
JBHT - BTOC
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CRGO - BTOC
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
FDX - BTOC
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
SFWL - BTOC
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
More

SFWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFWL and FDX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFWL and FDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFWL
1D Price
Change %
SFWL100%
+2.31%
FDX - SFWL
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
CRGO - SFWL
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
BTOC - SFWL
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
JBHT - SFWL
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
ATXG - SFWL
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
More