BTUMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.23M
BXXRF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.37M
Ad is loading...

BTUMF vs BXXRF

Header iconBTUMF vs BXXRF Comparison
Open Charts BTUMF vs BXXRFBanner chart's image
BTU METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Volume$110K
Capitalization3.23M
Exgen Resources
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$75K
Capitalization3.37M
BTUMF vs BXXRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTUMF vs. BXXRF commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTUMF is a Hold and BXXRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BTUMF: $0.03 vs. BXXRF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BTUMF and BXXRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTUMF: 184% vs. BXXRF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTUMF: $3.23M vs. BXXRF: $3.37M
BTUMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.23M. BXXRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTUMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBXXRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BXXRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXXRF is a better buy in the long-term than BTUMF.

Price Growth

BTUMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.40% price change this week, while BXXRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXXRF($3.37M) and BTUMF($3.23M) have the same market capitalization . BTUMF YTD gains are higher at: 41.500 vs. BXXRF (0.000). BTUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -440.56K vs. BXXRF (-861.09K). BXXRF has more cash in the bank: 3.52M vs. BTUMF (254K). BTUMF has less debt than BXXRF: BTUMF (35K) vs BXXRF (205K). BTUMF (0) and BXXRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BTUMFBXXRFBTUMF / BXXRF
Capitalization3.23M3.37M96%
EBITDA-440.56K-861.09K51%
Gain YTD41.5000.000-
P/E RatioN/A2.50-
Revenue00-
Total Cash254K3.52M7%
Total Debt35K205K17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXXRF: Fundamental Ratings
BXXRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMVAX31.14N/A
N/A
Kirr Marbach Partners Value
NEFOX30.01N/A
N/A
Natixis Oakmark A
RCMPX16.97N/A
N/A
Lazard International Quality Gr R6
CNWCX74.59-1.96
-2.56%
American Funds New World 529C
JGLYX16.10-0.64
-3.82%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R4

BTUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTUMF and FMELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTUMF and FMELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTUMF
1D Price
Change %
BTUMF100%
-44.83%
FMELF - BTUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLLF - BTUMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
LRDJF - BTUMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - BTUMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
CCHI - BTUMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BXXRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BXXRF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BXXRF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXXRF
1D Price
Change %
BXXRF100%
N/A
GMINF - BXXRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
ACKRF - BXXRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
CAHPF - BXXRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CCHI - BXXRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTUMF - BXXRF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-44.83%
More