BTUMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.23M
FMELF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTUMF vs FMELF

Header iconBTUMF vs FMELF Comparison
Open Charts BTUMF vs FMELFBanner chart's image
BTU METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.23M
FUTURE METALS NL
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16K
Capitalization8.53M
BTUMF vs FMELF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMELF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTUMF vs. FMELF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTUMF is a Hold and FMELF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BTUMF: $0.03 vs. FMELF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: BTUMF and FMELF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTUMF: 4% vs. FMELF: 17%
Market capitalization -- BTUMF: $3.23M vs. FMELF: $8.53M
BTUMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.23M. FMELF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTUMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMELF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMELF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTUMF is a better buy in the long-term than FMELF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTUMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMELF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTUMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FMELF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMELF is a better buy in the short-term than BTUMF.

Price Growth

BTUMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while FMELF (@Precious Metals) price change was -34.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMELF($8.53M) has a higher market cap than BTUMF($3.23M). BTUMF YTD gains are higher at: 69.000 vs. FMELF (-34.000). BTUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -440.56K vs. FMELF (-6.65M).
BTUMFFMELFBTUMF / FMELF
Capitalization3.23M8.53M38%
EBITDA-440.56K-6.65M7%
Gain YTD69.000-34.000-203%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash254KN/A-
Total Debt35KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTUMFFMELF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMELF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRDN15.670.44
+2.89%
Viridian Therapeutics
AFRI7.830.10
+1.29%
Forafric Global PLC
AGI26.990.02
+0.07%
Alamos Gold
CAPN10.32N/A
N/A
Cayson Acquisition Corp
ELV347.84-2.41
-0.69%
Elevance Health

BTUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTUMF and FMELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTUMF and FMELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTUMF
1D Price
Change %
BTUMF100%
N/A
FMELF - BTUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
BTLLF - BTUMF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - BTUMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
CCHI - BTUMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAHPF - BTUMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMELF and BTUMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMELF and BTUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMELF
1D Price
Change %
FMELF100%
-5.04%
BTUMF - FMELF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRG - FMELF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - FMELF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
VMSSF - FMELF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGLF - FMELF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
More