BTVCF
Price
$15.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
CCOJY
Price
$6.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTVCF vs CCOJY

Header iconBTVCF vs CCOJY Comparison
Open Charts BTVCF vs CCOJYBanner chart's image
Britvic
Price$15.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan
Price$6.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$525
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BTVCF vs CCOJY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
BTVCF vs. CCOJY commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTVCF is a Hold and CCOJY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (BTVCF: $15.90 vs. CCOJY: $6.15)
Brand notoriety: BTVCF and CCOJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTVCF: 36% vs. CCOJY: 21%
Market capitalization -- BTVCF: $2.85B vs. CCOJY: $2.09B
BTVCF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $2.85B. CCOJY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTVCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOJY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTVCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCOJY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTVCF is a better buy in the long-term than CCOJY.

Price Growth

BTVCF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCOJY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.68% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTVCF($2.85B) has a higher market cap than CCOJY($2.09B). BTVCF YTD gains are higher at: 47.222 vs. CCOJY (-10.171). CCOJY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.2B vs. BTVCF (276M). CCOJY has more cash in the bank: 77.9B vs. BTVCF (48M). BTVCF has less debt than CCOJY: BTVCF (732M) vs CCOJY (178B). CCOJY has higher revenues than BTVCF: CCOJY (821B) vs BTVCF (1.69B).
BTVCFCCOJYBTVCF / CCOJY
Capitalization2.85B2.09B136%
EBITDA276M35.2B1%
Gain YTD47.222-10.171-464%
P/E Ratio14.60N/A-
Revenue1.69B821B0%
Total Cash48M77.9B0%
Total Debt732M178B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTVCF vs CCOJY: Fundamental Ratings
BTVCF
CCOJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4452
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
3285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4279
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTVCF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJY (60). This means that BTVCF’s stock grew similarly to CCOJY’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJY (100). This means that BTVCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJY’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCF's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJY (85). This means that BTVCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJY’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJY (79). This means that BTVCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJY’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOJY (98). This means that BTVCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOJY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSTCX55.160.39
+0.71%
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Port
UBVUX86.560.31
+0.36%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R4
IVFIX3.86N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Strat Val Div IS
WIFMX3.69N/A
N/A
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
MTERX60.63-0.13
-0.21%
MFS Technology R2

BTVCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTVCF and CCHBF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTVCF and CCHBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTVCF
1D Price
Change %
BTVCF100%
N/A
CCHBF - BTVCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHGY - BTVCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
CCOJY - BTVCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDP - BTVCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
BRFH - BTVCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
More

CCOJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOJY and MNST have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOJY and MNST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOJY
1D Price
Change %
CCOJY100%
N/A
MNST - CCOJY
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.42%
CELH - CCOJY
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
CCHGY - CCOJY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
CHFHY - CCOJY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDP - CCOJY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More