Ad is loading...
BTVCY
Price
$32.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
66 days until earnings call
CCOJF
Price
$12.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTVCY vs CCOJF

Header iconBTVCY vs CCOJF Comparison
Open Charts BTVCY vs CCOJFBanner chart's image
Britvic
Price$32.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$138
CapitalizationN/A
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan
Price$12.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BTVCY vs CCOJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTVCY vs. CCOJF commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTVCY is a Hold and CCOJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BTVCY: $32.36 vs. CCOJF: $12.88)
Brand notoriety: BTVCY and CCOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTVCY: 21% vs. CCOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTVCY: $2.85B vs. CCOJF: $2.09B
BTVCY [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $2.85B. CCOJF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTVCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTVCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCOJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTVCY is a better buy in the long-term than CCOJF.

Price Growth

BTVCY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCOJF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTVCY is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.16% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTVCY($2.85B) has a higher market cap than CCOJF($2.09B). BTVCY YTD gains are higher at: 51.313 vs. CCOJF (9.153). CCOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.2B vs. BTVCY (276M). CCOJF has more cash in the bank: 77.9B vs. BTVCY (48M). BTVCY has less debt than CCOJF: BTVCY (732M) vs CCOJF (178B). CCOJF has higher revenues than BTVCY: CCOJF (821B) vs BTVCY (1.69B).
BTVCYCCOJFBTVCY / CCOJF
Capitalization2.85B2.09B136%
EBITDA276M35.2B1%
Gain YTD51.3139.153561%
P/E Ratio15.11N/A-
Revenue1.69B821B0%
Total Cash48M77.9B0%
Total Debt732M178B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTVCY vs CCOJF: Fundamental Ratings
BTVCY
CCOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8940
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
3186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2430

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTVCY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (90). This means that BTVCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (100). This means that BTVCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCY's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (86). This means that BTVCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJF (54). This means that BTVCY’s stock grew similarly to CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

BTVCY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOJF (98). This means that BTVCY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCVFX36.000.61
+1.72%
Allspring Small Company Value C
MASOX11.740.19
+1.65%
MoA Small Cap Equity Index Fund
PIOKX47.130.19
+0.40%
Pioneer K
NEAMX32.530.09
+0.28%
Neiman Large Cap Value A
ALGYX82.64N/A
N/A
Alger Focus Equity Y

BTVCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTVCY and CCHGY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTVCY and CCHGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTVCY
1D Price
Change %
BTVCY100%
N/A
CCHGY - BTVCY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
BRFH - BTVCY
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
CCOJF - BTVCY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTVCF - BTVCY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOJY - BTVCY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CCOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOJF and CCHGY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOJF and CCHGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOJF
1D Price
Change %
CCOJF100%
N/A
CCHGY - CCOJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
BRFH - CCOJF
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
CELH - CCOJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
KDP - CCOJF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
CHFHY - CCOJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More