BUJA
Price
$11.50
Change
-$0.08 (-0.69%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.58M
GIGGU
Price
$10.56
Change
-$0.55 (-4.95%)
Updated
Apr 4, 11:17 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

BUJA vs GIGGU

Header iconBUJA vs GIGGU Comparison
Open Charts BUJA vs GIGGUBanner chart's image
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
Price$11.50
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization81.58M
GigCapital7
Price$10.56
Change-$0.55 (-4.95%)
Volume$430
CapitalizationN/A
BUJA vs GIGGU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUJA vs. GIGGU commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUJA is a Hold and GIGGU is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BUJA: $11.58 vs. GIGGU: $11.11)
Brand notoriety: BUJA and GIGGU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUJA: 8% vs. GIGGU: 29%
Market capitalization -- BUJA: $81.58M vs. GIGGU: $0
BUJA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $81.58M. GIGGU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUJA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGIGGU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BUJA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GIGGU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUJA is a better buy in the long-term than GIGGU.

Price Growth

BUJA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while GIGGU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +8.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.32% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIGGU YTD gains are higher at: 10.231 vs. BUJA (3.393). GIGGU has more cash in the bank: 1.65M vs. BUJA (355K).
BUJAGIGGUBUJA / GIGGU
Capitalization81.6MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.39310.23133%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash355K1.65M21%
Total DebtN/A125K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRGOX20.86N/A
N/A
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals C
HQIYX21.06N/A
N/A
Hartford Equity Income Y
DHPYX16.78N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Mid Cap Y
QLSGX25.50N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6
CAISX9.53N/A
N/A
Calamos International Small Cap Gr A

BUJA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUJA has been loosely correlated with SKGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUJA jumps, then SKGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUJA
1D Price
Change %
BUJA100%
-0.17%
SKGR - BUJA
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
GATE - BUJA
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RRACF - BUJA
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMBU - BUJA
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
HCVIU - BUJA
24%
Poorly correlated
+25.23%
More

GIGGU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGGU and HCVIU have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGGU and HCVIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIGGU
1D Price
Change %
GIGGU100%
N/A
HCVIU - GIGGU
28%
Poorly correlated
+25.23%
GIG - GIGGU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BUJA - GIGGU
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
SBHGF - GIGGU
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
HYAC - GIGGU
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More