Ad is loading...
BUJA
Price
$10.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
QOMOU
Price
$11.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

BUJA vs QOMOU

Header iconBUJA vs QOMOU Comparison
Open Charts BUJA vs QOMOUBanner chart's image
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
Price$10.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Qomolangma Acquisition
Price$11.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BUJA vs QOMOU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUJA vs. QOMOU commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUJA is a Sell and QOMOU is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BUJA: $10.99 vs. QOMOU: $11.31)
Brand notoriety: BUJA and QOMOU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUJA: 178% vs. QOMOU: 31%
Market capitalization -- BUJA: $81.58M vs. QOMOU: $0
BUJA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $81.58M. QOMOU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUJA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQOMOU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BUJA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QOMOU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QOMOU is a better buy in the long-term than BUJA.

Price Growth

BUJA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QOMOU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

QOMOU is expected to report earnings on Jun 06, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUJA YTD gains are higher at: 5.775 vs. QOMOU (5.307). BUJA has more cash in the bank: 355K vs. QOMOU (46.6K).
BUJAQOMOUBUJA / QOMOU
Capitalization81.6MN/A-
EBITDAN/A-1.57M-
Gain YTD5.7755.307109%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash355K46.6K762%
Total DebtN/A792K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WLCVX23.30-0.17
-0.72%
Wilshire Large Company Value Instl
TRPSX31.23-0.37
-1.17%
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq Premier
NCGFX69.36-0.96
-1.37%
New Covenant Growth
SELCX51.15-0.92
-1.77%
SEI Large Cap Growth F (SIMT)
JMIGX24.86-0.51
-2.01%
Jacob Discovery Fd Instl

BUJA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUJA and RRAC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUJA and RRAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUJA
1D Price
Change %
BUJA100%
N/A
RRAC - BUJA
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRLHU - BUJA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYNOU - BUJA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QOMOU - BUJA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BUJAU - BUJA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QOMOU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QOMOU has been closely correlated with CITEU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QOMOU jumps, then CITEU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QOMOU
1D Price
Change %
QOMOU100%
N/A
CITEU - QOMOU
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
FLDDU - QOMOU
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDSTU - QOMOU
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAVS - QOMOU
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
BNIX - QOMOU
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More