BUJA
Price
$11.21
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 16, 10:30 AM (EDT)
RRACF
Price
$11.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

BUJA vs RRACF

Header iconBUJA vs RRACF Comparison
Open Charts BUJA vs RRACFBanner chart's image
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
Price$11.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Rigel Resource Acquisition
Price$11.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$152.01K
CapitalizationN/A
BUJA vs RRACF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUJA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUJA vs. RRACF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUJA is a Hold and RRACF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (BUJA: $11.20 vs. RRACF: $11.50)
Brand notoriety: BUJA and RRACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUJA: 0% vs. RRACF: 879%
Market capitalization -- BUJA: $81.58M vs. RRACF: $358.22M
BUJA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $81.58M. RRACF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $358.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUJA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRRACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUJA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BUJA and RRACF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUJA’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRACF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUJA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RRACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRACF is a better buy in the short-term than BUJA.

Price Growth

BUJA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+2.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRACF($358M) has a higher market cap than BUJA($81.6M). BUJA YTD gains are higher at: 7.796 vs. RRACF (4.927). BUJA has more cash in the bank: 355K vs. RRACF (70.7K).
BUJARRACFBUJA / RRACF
Capitalization81.6M358M23%
EBITDAN/A-2.45M-
Gain YTD7.7964.927158%
P/E RatioN/A53.19-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash355K70.7K502%
Total DebtN/A5.56M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUJARRACF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUJA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMTI2.150.04
+1.90%
Rockwell Medical
MGNI16.420.25
+1.55%
Magnite
VVV36.820.28
+0.77%
Valvoline
AIRS5.440.03
+0.55%
AirSculpt Technologies
CNI102.900.43
+0.42%
Canadian National Railway

BUJA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUJA and RRACF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUJA and RRACF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUJA
1D Price
Change %
BUJA100%
N/A
RRACF - BUJA
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRLHU - BUJA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYNOU - BUJA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QOMOU - BUJA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BUJAU - BUJA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRACF has been closely correlated with BYNOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRACF jumps, then BYNOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRACF
1D Price
Change %
RRACF100%
N/A
BYNOU - RRACF
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
HAIUF - RRACF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TETEU - RRACF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
DUET - RRACF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BUJA - RRACF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More