BUJA
Price
$11.58
Change
-$0.02 (-0.17%)
Updated
Apr 3, 03:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.58M
RRACF
Price
$9.10
Change
-$2.72 (-23.01%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
358.22M
Ad is loading...

BUJA vs RRACF

Header iconBUJA vs RRACF Comparison
Open Charts BUJA vs RRACFBanner chart's image
Bukit Jalil Global Acquisition 1
Price$11.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization81.58M
Rigel Resource Acquisition
Price$9.10
Change-$2.72 (-23.01%)
Volume$200
Capitalization358.22M
BUJA vs RRACF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUJA vs. RRACF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUJA is a Hold and RRACF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BUJA: $11.60 vs. RRACF: $9.10)
Brand notoriety: BUJA and RRACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUJA: 10% vs. RRACF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BUJA: $81.58M vs. RRACF: $358.22M
BUJA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $81.58M. RRACF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $358.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUJA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRRACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUJA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RRACF is a better buy in the long-term than BUJA.

Price Growth

BUJA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +3.57% price change this week, while RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.79% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRACF($358M) has a higher market cap than BUJA($81.6M). BUJA YTD gains are higher at: 3.571 vs. RRACF (-20.870). BUJA has more cash in the bank: 355K vs. RRACF (70.7K).
BUJARRACFBUJA / RRACF
Capitalization81.6M358M23%
EBITDAN/A-2.45M-
Gain YTD3.571-20.870-17%
P/E RatioN/A53.19-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash355K70.7K502%
Total DebtN/A5.56M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BVSIX17.100.12
+0.71%
Baywood Socially Responsible Instl
ECSMX10.90N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
SIFAX8.14N/A
N/A
SEI Multi-Asset Inflation Mgd F (SIMT)
PHSTX57.58N/A
N/A
Putnam Global Health Care A
MKVBX14.31N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value A

BUJA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUJA has been loosely correlated with SKGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUJA jumps, then SKGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUJA
1D Price
Change %
BUJA100%
+2.52%
SKGR - BUJA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
GATE - BUJA
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RRACF - BUJA
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMBU - BUJA
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCVIU - BUJA
30%
Poorly correlated
+21.71%
More

RRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRACF has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RRACF jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRACF
1D Price
Change %
RRACF100%
N/A
HAIUF - RRACF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BUJA - RRACF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
PLMIU - RRACF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAU - RRACF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCVIU - RRACF
25%
Poorly correlated
+21.71%
More