BUR
Price
$15.35
Change
-$0.12 (-0.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
17 days until earnings call
OFS
Price
$8.25
Change
-$0.12 (-1.43%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
133.04M
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUR vs OFS

Header iconBUR vs OFS Comparison
Open Charts BUR vs OFSBanner chart's image
Burford Capital
Price$15.35
Change-$0.12 (-0.78%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization3.49B
OFS Capital
Price$8.25
Change-$0.12 (-1.43%)
Volume$27.02K
Capitalization133.04M
BUR vs OFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUR vs. OFS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUR is a Hold and OFS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BUR: $15.35 vs. OFS: $8.25)
Brand notoriety: BUR and OFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUR: 138% vs. OFS: 60%
Market capitalization -- BUR: $3.49B vs. OFS: $133.04M
BUR [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.49B. OFS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $133.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUR is a better buy in the long-term than OFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUR’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUR is a better buy in the short-term than OFS.

Price Growth

BUR (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while OFS (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUR is expected to report earnings on Jun 17, 2025.

OFS is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUR($3.49B) has a higher market cap than OFS($133M). OFS has higher P/E ratio than BUR: OFS (23.43) vs BUR (5.82). BUR YTD gains are higher at: 20.392 vs. OFS (2.230). OFS has less debt than BUR: OFS (300M) vs BUR (1.55B). BUR has higher revenues than OFS: BUR (807M) vs OFS (4.79M).
BUROFSBUR / OFS
Capitalization3.49B133M2,626%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.3922.230914%
P/E Ratio5.8223.4325%
Revenue807M4.79M16,844%
Total CashN/A15.9M-
Total Debt1.55B300M517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUR vs OFS: Fundamental Ratings
BUR
OFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1926
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1057
SMR RATING
1..100
4182
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8346
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OFS's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (32) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that OFS’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OFS (57) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OFS’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's SMR Rating (41) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OFS (82) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OFS’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as OFS (52) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew similarly to OFS’s over the last 12 months.

OFS's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUR (83) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that OFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUROFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPYCX8.92-0.10
-1.11%
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq C
GMAWX23.07-0.39
-1.66%
GMO Small Cap Quality III
CICEX58.88-1.11
-1.85%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529E
FSGAX46.86-1.39
-2.88%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv
FKRCX21.26-0.73
-3.32%
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals A

BUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUR has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUR jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUR
1D Price
Change %
BUR100%
-0.78%
APAM - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
BN - BUR
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
CG - BUR
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
BBUC - BUR
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
HLNE - BUR
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
More

OFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OFS has been loosely correlated with NXDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OFS jumps, then NXDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFS
1D Price
Change %
OFS100%
-1.43%
NXDT - OFS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
NEWT - OFS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
FSK - OFS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
PFLT - OFS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
BUR - OFS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
More