BUSE
Price
$25.10
Change
+$0.44 (+1.78%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
16 days until earnings call
CCNE
Price
$22.94
Change
+$0.54 (+2.41%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs CCNE

Header iconBUSE vs CCNE Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs CCNEBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$25.10
Change+$0.44 (+1.78%)
Volume$249.18K
CapitalizationN/A
CNB Financial
Price$22.94
Change+$0.54 (+2.41%)
Volume$37.14K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BUSE vs CCNE Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CCNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BUSE vs. CCNE commentary
Oct 07, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a StrongSell and CCNE is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2024
Stock price -- (BUSE: $25.10 vs. CCNE: $22.94)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CCNE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 81% vs. CCNE: 89%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. CCNE: $415.58M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. CCNE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $415.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCNE is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCNE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CCNE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than CCNE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.03% price change this week, while CCNE (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

CCNE is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than CCNE($416M). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than CCNE: BUSE (10.79) vs CCNE (7.88). BUSE (4.236) and CCNE (4.168) have similar YTD gains . BUSE has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. CCNE (61.5M). CCNE has less debt than BUSE: CCNE (143M) vs BUSE (336M). BUSE has higher revenues than CCNE: BUSE (442M) vs CCNE (218M).
BUSECCNEBUSE / CCNE
Capitalization1.33B416M319%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.2364.168102%
P/E Ratio10.797.88137%
Revenue442M218M203%
Total Cash142M61.5M231%
Total Debt336M143M235%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CCNE: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CCNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5861
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
1521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2121
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCNE (61). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CCNE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCNE (100). This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCNE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCNE (21). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CCNE’s over the last 12 months.

CCNE's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (51). This means that CCNE’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CCNE's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (21). This means that CCNE’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECCNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CCNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNFGX43.470.60
+1.40%
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth N
CRLSX10.740.10
+0.94%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invstmnts Intl Eq Ins
EQNBX22.350.19
+0.86%
MFS Equity Income B
GLBIX9.990.03
+0.30%
Leuthold Global Inst
CSIEX84.690.08
+0.09%
Calvert Equity A

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+1.78%
FFBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
TOWN - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
FRME - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
UBSI - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More